Joseph Lagana v. Alex Villanueva, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSEPH VICTOR LAGANA
Respondent / Appellee: ALEX VILLANUEVA, Los Angeles County Sheriff and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: 22-55163
Filed: February 10, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2022 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Joseph Victor Lagana response to order on 2/14/2022. Not dated. [12383431] (RL) [Entered: 03/01/2022 02:42 PM]
February 23, 2022 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Joseph Victor Lagana letter dated 02/15/2022 re: Additional filing/sworn affidavit of true and exact copy of court minutes & psych records. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12377786] (RL) [Entered: 02/23/2022 12:05 PM]
February 23, 2022 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Joseph Victor Lagana letter dated 02/15/2022 re: Notice of pro se inability to electronic file. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12377779] (RL) [Entered: 02/23/2022 12:03 PM]
February 18, 2022 Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/18/2022 ORDER denying post-judgement motions. [12375079] (RL) [Entered: 02/18/2022 03:07 PM]
February 14, 2022 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: KMB): The record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this request for a certificate of appealability because the notice of appeal was not filed or deposited for mailing in the prisons internal mail system within 30 days after entry of the district courts judgment on November 2, 2021. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), (c). The record does not reflect that appellant has filed a motion in the district court to extend or reopen the time for appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), (6), and 26(b)(1). Within 21 days after this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of this request for a certificate of appealability or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this request for a certificate of appealability pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. [12369000] (OC) [Entered: 02/14/2022 09:40 AM]
February 10, 2022 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 11/01/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12366480] (OC) [Entered: 02/10/2022 12:59 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joseph Lagana v. Alex Villanueva, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: JOSEPH VICTOR LAGANA
Represented By: Joseph Victor Lagana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ALEX VILLANUEVA, Los Angeles County Sheriff
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?