Adam Lopez v. Samuel Ko, et al
| ADAM RAY LOPEZ |
| SAMUEL KO, Primary Care Physician and MAJA BOYD, Nurse Practitioner |
| 22-55174 |
| February 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Adam Ray Lopez motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until 07/15/2022. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/08/2022. [12423034] (QDL) [Entered: 04/15/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed order MEDIATION (JW): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [12419722] (RY) [Entered: 04/13/2022 09:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order MEDIATION (BLS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential. Participants with an email address on the attached list will receive an email with dial-in information. If an email address is not listed or if there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at [email protected]. Participants may also leave a message at (415) 355-7900 to request dial-in information. Finally, please notify Circuit Mediator Jonathan Westen immediately by email ([email protected]) if a participant has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. Please copy all participants on any such communications. All emails should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All written or spoken communication with the mediator, including the discussions during the scheduled conference, are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. Additional information about confidentiality (including a copy of Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1), the assessment conference, and the Mediation Program are attached and can also be found at the Mediation Program website (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. (SEE ORDER FOR FULL TEXT) [12403985] (RY) [Entered: 03/24/2022 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Adam Ray Lopez motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/25/2022. [12389670] (QDL) [Entered: 03/08/2022 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 03/02/2022. [Case Number 22-55174: Partially Paid] [12389663] (QDL) [Entered: 03/08/2022 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Adam Ray Lopez letter dated 02/15/2022 re: Request for instructions and/or forms to appeal a final judgment from the district court. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12378264] (QDL) [Entered: 02/23/2022 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12372277] (CKP) [Entered: 02/16/2022 01:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Adam Ray Lopez opening brief due 04/15/2022. Appellees Maja Boyd and Samuel Ko answering brief due 05/16/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12371738] (RT) [Entered: 02/16/2022 10:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
