Raymond Bradford v. Jeremy Doeneberger, et al
| RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD |
| JEREMY L. DOENEBERGER, M. VOONG, M. FORDHAM, S. GATES, T. RAMOS, D. ASUNCION, M. WARMSCLY, A. FRIEDMON and E. JORDAN |
| 22-55196 |
| February 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Raymond Alford Bradford motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis; to take judicial notice. Deficiencies: None. [12394689] (NAC) [Entered: 03/15/2022 07:33 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Raymond Alford Bradford motion to proceed under the pre filing review order, in forma pauperis, to take judicial notice. Deficiencies: None. [12392859] (NAC) [Entered: 03/11/2022 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 03/02/2022. [12392855] (NAC) [Entered: 03/11/2022 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 08-80078. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [12378457] (RT) [Entered: 02/23/2022 05:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
