Jason Casillas, et al v. George Ruben, et al
| JASON CASILLAS, MICHELE K. CASILLAS and MICHELE KUUIPO CASILLAS |
| GEORGE RUBEN and DOUGLAS MANN |
| 22-55201 |
| February 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Michele Kuuipo Casillas Correspondence: Statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. Date of service: 04/14/2022 [12421978] [22-55201] (Casillas, Michele) [Entered: 04/14/2022 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) Appellants emergency motion for a stay (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) is denied. Appellants response to this courts March 18, 2022 order to show cause remains due April 22, 2022. Briefing remains suspended. The Clerk will send appellants a copy of the March 18, 2022 order to show cause.[12415177] (WL) [Entered: 04/07/2022 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Michele Kuuipo Casillas EMERGENCY Motion to expedite case. Date of service: 04/05/2022. [12413532] [22-55201] (Casillas, Michele) [Entered: 04/05/2022 06:55 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellants must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellants do not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellants file a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellants submit any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellants: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellants may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12399567] (AF) [Entered: 03/18/2022 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 Mail returned on 03/08/2022 addressed to Jason Casillas, re: [ # 2 ] Clerk Order. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, unable to forward. Resending to: P.O. Box 81, Running Springs, CA 92382. [12390873] (LA) [Entered: 03/09/2022 03:38 PM] |
| Filing 4 Mail returned on 03/07/2022 addressed to Jason Casillas, re: [ # 1 ] Case Opening Document. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, not deliverable as addressed, unable to forward. Resending to: P.O. Box 81, Running Springs, CA 92382. [12390869] (LA) [Entered: 03/09/2022 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jason Casillas and Michele Kuuipo Casillas Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Forma Pauperis (Form 4). Date of service: 03/08/2022. [12389667] [22-55201] (Casillas, Michele) [Entered: 03/08/2022 03:36 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12380174] (CKP) [Entered: 02/25/2022 11:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANTS AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Jason Casillas and Michele K. Casillas opening brief due 04/25/2022. [12379402] (RT) [Entered: 02/24/2022 03:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
