Chimesa Medina v. The Boeing Company
| CHIMESA MEDINA, an individual |
| THE BOEING COMPANY, also known as Boing, a corporation, ie Boeing Agents and/or employees Steve Giogoza, Jeffrey Recktenwald, Rich Harwin, Gregory Gracey, Joann Urtula, Amy Bartram, inclusive, (at times relevant to this case) |
| 22-55206 |
| February 28, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil Rights Accommodations |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [12405012] (AF) [Entered: 03/25/2022 10:50 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Chimesa Medina Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 03/09/2022. [12391718] [22-55206] (Suppa, Paul) [Entered: 03/10/2022 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable under 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Rule 54(b)); see also Riverhead Sav. Bank v. Natl Mortg. Equity Corp., 893 F.2d 1109, 1113 (9th Cir. 1990) (order awarding sanctions against party generally not appealable prior to entry of final judgment); Johnny Pflocks, Inc. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co., 634 F.2d 1215, 1216 (9th Cir. 1980) ([S]anctions in the nature of civil penalties are normally deemed interlocutory and thus nonappealable by the parties.). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12387873] (AF) [Entered: 03/07/2022 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Jill L. Ripke for party(s) Appellee The Boeing Company, in case 22-55206. [12383843] (DJV) [Entered: 03/02/2022 08:35 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jill Louise Ripke (PERKINS COIE LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 1700 Los Angeles, CA 90067-1721) for Appellee The Boeing Company. Date of service: 03/02/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12383839] [22-55206] (Ripke, Jill) [Entered: 03/02/2022 08:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant chimesa Medina opening brief due 04/26/2022. Appellee The Boeing Company answering brief due 05/26/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12381596] (HH) [Entered: 02/28/2022 11:14 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Chimesa Medina v. The Boeing Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: CHIMESA MEDINA, an individual | |
| Represented By: | Paul Suppa |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: THE BOEING COMPANY, also known as Boing, a corporation, ie Boeing Agents and/or employees Steve Giogoza, Jeffrey Recktenwald, Rich Harwin, Gregory Gracey, Joann Urtula, Amy Bartram, inclusive, (at times relevant to this case) | |
| Represented By: | Jill L. Ripke |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
