Anand Alexander v. Ralph Diaz, et al
| ANAND JON ALEXANDER |
| RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER E. RAMIREZ, PATRICK COVELLO, KARL E. GRETHER, COREY CROSS, LINDSEY GERVASONI, GABRIEL MENCHACA and DOES, 1-70, inclusive and jointly and severally |
| 22-55223 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ANAND ALEXANDER V. RALPH DIAZ, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Motion [ # 5 ] (ECF Filing) filed by Appellant Anand Jon Alexander; Appellant Anand Jon Alexander opening brief due 08/31/2022. Appellees Patrick Covello, Corey Cross, Ralph Diaz, Does, Lindsey Gervasoni, Karl E. Grether, Gabriel Menchaca, Daniel Paramo, Warden, Marcus Pollard, Warden and E. Ramirez answering brief due 09/30/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12408516] (GS) [Entered: 03/30/2022 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 6 Attorney Terrence F. Sheehy in 22-55223 substituted by Attorney Martha P. Ehlenbach in 22-55223 [12407757] (RR) [Entered: 03/29/2022 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Anand Jon Alexander Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 08/31/2022. Date of service: 03/29/2022. [12407404] [22-55223] (Rutman, Keith) [Entered: 03/29/2022 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Martha P. Ehlenbach (Office of the Attorney General, Department of Justice, 1300 I Street, Sacramento, CA 95814) for Appellees Ralph Diaz, Marcus Pollard, Daniel Paramo, E. Ramirez, Patrick Covello, Karl E. Grether, Corey Cross, Lindsey Gervasoni and Gabriel Menchaca. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Terrence F. Sheehy, Esquire for Appellees Patrick Covello, Corey Cross, Ralph Diaz, Lindsey Gervasoni, Karl E. Grether, Gabriel Menchaca, Daniel Paramo, Marcus Pollard and E. Ramirez. Date of service: 03/29/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12407153] [22-55223] (Ehlenbach, Martha) [Entered: 03/29/2022 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/09/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12389925]. [22-55223] (AD) [Entered: 03/09/2022 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Anand Jon Alexander Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/09/2022. [12389919] [22-55223] (Rutman, Keith) [Entered: 03/09/2022 05:59 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Anand Jon Alexander Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/09/2022. Appellant Anand Jon Alexander opening brief due 04/29/2022. Appellees Patrick Covello, Corey Cross, Ralph Diaz, Does, Lindsey Gervasoni, Karl E. Grether, Gabriel Menchaca, Daniel Paramo, Warden, Marcus Pollard, Warden and E. Ramirez answering brief due 05/31/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12384137] (JMR) [Entered: 03/02/2022 10:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
