V. R., et al v. County of San Bernardino, et al
| RAMONA TERRAZAS, ABRAHAM TERRAZAS, BLANCA ZUNIGA, DAVID ZUNIGA, Sr., DAVID ZUNIGA, Jr., in each case individually and JOSE ZUNIGA |
| DOES, 4-10, inclusive |
| V. R., a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem Ariana Toscano, individually and as successor in interest toJuan Ramon Ramos, deceased |
| COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, GARY WHEELER, THUN HOUN and JASON CALVERT |
| 22-55242 |
| March 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Motion [ # 14 ] (ECF Filing) filed by Appellants County of San Bernardino and Gary Wheeler; Appellants Jason Calvert, County of San Bernardino, Thun Houn and Gary Wheeler opening brief due 05/31/2022. Appellee V. R. answering brief due 06/30/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12433559] (GS) [Entered: 04/28/2022 12:15 PM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellants County of San Bernardino and Gary Wheeler Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 05/31/2022. Date of service: 04/26/2022. [12431776] [22-55242] (Fujii, John) [Entered: 04/26/2022 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 13 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12424820] (BLS) [Entered: 04/18/2022 05:21 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) Appellants opposed emergency motion for a stay pending appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009). The briefing schedule established previously remains in effect. [12416871] (WL) [Entered: 04/11/2022 09:23 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jason Calvert, County of San Bernardino, Thun Houn and Gary Wheeler reply to response (). Date of service: 04/08/2022. [12415653] [22-55242] (Fujii, John) [Entered: 04/08/2022 08:50 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee V. R. response opposing motion ([ # 8 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 8 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 04/07/2022. [12414610] [22-55242] (Masongsong, Renee) [Entered: 04/07/2022 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON) The court has received appellants emergency motion for a stay of district court proceedings. The request for an immediate stay of district court proceedings is denied. The response to the motion is due by 9:00 am Pacific Time on Thursday, April 7, 2022. The optional reply in support of the motion is due by 9:00 am Pacific Time on Friday, April 8, 2022. [12412881] (OC) [Entered: 04/05/2022 11:02 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jason Calvert, County of San Bernardino, Thun Houn and Gary Wheeler EMERGENCY Motion to stay lower court action. Date of service: 04/04/2022. [12412502] [22-55242] (Fujii, John) [Entered: 04/04/2022 07:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 04/08/2022. See order for details. [12408981] (BLS) [Entered: 03/30/2022 02:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 03/29/2022, 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12405964] (BLS) [Entered: 03/28/2022 10:22 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties are directed to address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over both the individual appellants and the County of San Bernardinos respective appeals. See Villanueva v. California, 986 F.3d 1158, 1164 (9th Cir. 2021) (court of appeals has jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal from denial of qualified immunity only to the extent that it turns on an issue of law (citation omitted)); Dougherty v. City of Covina, 654 F.3d 892, 900 (9th Cir. 2011) (Qualified immunity does not shield municipalities from liability.). The established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12404942] (WL) [Entered: 03/25/2022 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 03/21/2022, 1:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12398587] (BLS) [Entered: 03/17/2022 11:27 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/14/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12393874]. [22-55242] (AD) [Entered: 03/14/2022 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Jason Calvert, County of San Bernardino, Thun Houn and Gary Wheeler Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/14/2022. [12393488] [22-55242] (Fujii, John) [Entered: 03/14/2022 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Jason Calvert, County of San Bernardino, Thun Houn and Gary Wheeler Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/11/2022. Appellants Jason Calvert, County of San Bernardino, Thun Houn and Gary Wheeler opening brief due 05/02/2022. Appellee V. R. answering brief due 06/01/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12386776] (JMR) [Entered: 03/04/2022 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
