Deborah Tichenor v. Bae Systems Technology Solutions & Services, Inc., et al
| BAE SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS & SERVICES, INC. and DOES, Does 1 through 30, inclusive |
| DEBORAH J. TICHENOR |
| KARI CORONADO |
| 22-55259 |
| March 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: SJS) Appellants motion to dismiss this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12425073] (OC) [Entered: 04/19/2022 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Deborah J. Tichenor Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 04/14/2022. [12421726] [22-55259] (Hart, Hoyt) [Entered: 04/14/2022 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable under 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Rule 54(b)). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12408371] (OC) [Entered: 03/30/2022 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 6 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-55259: Paid] ). [12406146] (JFF) [Entered: 03/28/2022 11:45 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Deborah J. Tichenor Correspondence: receipt for filing fee payment $505.00. Date of service: 03/28/2022 [12405915] [22-55259] (Hart, Hoyt) [Entered: 03/28/2022 09:50 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 04/15/2022, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12405472] (CL) [Entered: 03/25/2022 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/20/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12399906]. [22-55259] (AD) [Entered: 03/20/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Deborah J. Tichenor Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/20/2022. [12399903] [22-55259] (Hart, Hoyt) [Entered: 03/20/2022 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Deborah J. Tichenor Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/21/2022. Transcript ordered by 04/11/2022. Transcript due 05/11/2022. Appellant Deborah J. Tichenor opening brief due 06/20/2022. Appellee Kari Coronado answering brief due 07/20/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12393450] (HH) [Entered: 03/14/2022 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
