Enrique Lozano, et al v. Julio Yee Cabrera, et al
Defendant: BEAMSPEED, LLC, an Arizona Limited Liability Company and DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff / Appellant: ENRIQUE LOZANO
Appellant: MARK D. POTTER
Appellee: WILLIAM ANTHONY ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee: JULIO YEE CABRERA and ENRIQUE WONG VASQUEZ
Case Number: 22-55273
Filed: March 15, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 7, 2023 ENRIQUE LOZANO, ET AL V. JULIO YEE CABRERA, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2022 Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/30/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12408691]. [22-55273] (AD) [Entered: 03/30/2022 12:44 PM]
March 30, 2022 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees William Anthony Adams, Julio Yee Cabrera and Enrique Wong Vasquez Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/30/2022. [12408189] [22-55273] (Adams, William) [Entered: 03/30/2022 09:30 AM]
March 23, 2022 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/23/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12403583]. [22-55273] (AD) [Entered: 03/23/2022 06:44 PM]
March 23, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Enrique Lozano and Mark D. Potter Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/23/2022. [12403169] [22-55273] (Handy, Russell) [Entered: 03/23/2022 02:12 PM]
March 23, 2022 Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12402480] (LW) [Entered: 03/23/2022 09:38 AM]
March 15, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Enrique Lozano and Mark D. Potter Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/22/2022. Appellants Enrique Lozano and Mark D. Potter opening brief due 05/16/2022. Appellees William Anthony Adams, Julio Yee Cabrera and Enrique Wong Vasquez answering brief due 06/16/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12395142] (RT) [Entered: 03/15/2022 12:26 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Enrique Lozano, et al v. Julio Yee Cabrera, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ENRIQUE LOZANO
Represented By: Russell Clive Handy Esquire
Represented By: Dennis J. Price Esquire II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: MARK D. POTTER
Represented By: Russell Clive Handy Esquire
Represented By: Dennis J. Price Esquire II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: WILLIAM ANTHONY ADAMS
Represented By: William Anthony Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JULIO YEE CABRERA
Represented By: William Anthony Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ENRIQUE WONG VASQUEZ
Represented By: William Anthony Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BEAMSPEED, LLC, an Arizona Limited Liability Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: DOES, 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?