Karen Hartstein v. Hyatt Corporation
KAREN HARTSTEIN, in her representative capacity and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated |
HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation doing business in California |
22-55276 |
March 16, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Labor Litigation |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
KAREN HARTSTEIN V. HYATT CORPORATION |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 Added Attorney(s) Jonathan M. Genish for party(s) Appellant Karen Hartstein, in case 22-55276. [12471902] (QDL) [Entered: 06/15/2022 01:01 PM] |
Filing 12 Notice of Appearance (ECF Filing) [10] is rejected. Appearance filed for attorney not registered for electronic filing. Each attorney must register for e-filing and file their own notice of appearance. [12471901] (QDL) [Entered: 06/15/2022 01:00 PM] |
Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jonathan M. Genish (Blackstone Law APC, 8383 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 745, Beverly Hills, CA 90211) for Appellant Karen Hartstein. Date of service: 06/15/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12471805] [22-55276] (Genish, Jonathan) [Entered: 06/15/2022 12:03 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Matthew W. Dietz (Blackstone Law APC, 8383 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 745, Beverly Hills, CA 90211) for Appellant Karen Hartstein. Substitution for Attorney Ms. Jill Jessica Parker for Appellant Karen Hartstein. Date of service: 06/15/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12471803] [22-55276] (Genish, Jonathan) [Entered: 06/15/2022 12:01 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due August 24, 2022. The answering brief is due September 26, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12471106] (JMR) [Entered: 06/14/2022 03:34 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Karen Hartstein Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 08/24/2022. Date of service: 06/09/2022. [12467180] [22-55276] (Goldsmith, Eileen) [Entered: 06/09/2022 09:25 AM] |
Filing 7 Streamlined request [6] by Appellant Karen Hartstein to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Karen Hartstein opening brief due 07/25/2022. Appellee Hyatt Corporation answering brief due 08/24/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12446062] (JN) [Entered: 05/13/2022 09:01 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Karen Hartstein. New requested due date is 07/25/2022. [12445885] [22-55276] (Goldsmith, Eileen) [Entered: 05/12/2022 05:00 PM] |
Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12421267] (VS) [Entered: 04/14/2022 11:13 AM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 04/14/2022, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12407261] (VS) [Entered: 03/29/2022 10:27 AM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/23/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12402952]. [22-55276] (AD) [Entered: 03/23/2022 12:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Karen Hartstein Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/23/2022. [12402668] [22-55276] (Parker, Jill) [Entered: 03/23/2022 11:00 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Karen Hartstein Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/23/2022. Transcript ordered by 04/14/2022. Transcript due 05/16/2022. Appellant Karen Hartstein opening brief due 06/23/2022. Appellee Hyatt Corporation answering brief due 07/25/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12396087] (HH) [Entered: 03/16/2022 10:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Karen Hartstein v. Hyatt Corporation | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: KAREN HARTSTEIN, in her representative capacity and on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated | |
Represented By: | Eileen Goldsmith |
Represented By: | Jill Jessica Parker |
Represented By: | Michael Rubin |
Represented By: | Jonathan M. Genish Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: HYATT CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation doing business in California | |
Represented By: | Michael Afar |
Represented By: | Holger Besch Esquire |
Represented By: | Brian Patrick Long Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.