Nanubhai Patel, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: NANUBHAI M. PATEL, LALITABEN N. PATEL, VIMAL NANU PATEL and VIMAL, INC., a California corporation
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Case Number: 22-55294
Filed: March 23, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 11, 2023 Summary NANUBHAI PATEL, ET AL V. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2022 Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12437015] (VS) [Entered: 05/03/2022 12:56 PM]
April 15, 2022 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 04/29/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12422841] (VS) [Entered: 04/15/2022 02:03 PM]
April 5, 2022 Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Blithe Smith Bock for party(s) Appellee City of Los Angeles, in case 22-55294. [12412885] (NAC) [Entered: 04/05/2022 11:02 AM]
April 5, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Blithe Smith Bock (Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, 200 No. Spring Street, 14th Floor, City Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90012) for Appellee City of Los Angeles. Date of service: 04/05/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12412874] [22-55294] (Bock, Blithe) [Entered: 04/05/2022 11:00 AM]
March 31, 2022 Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellants have filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellants shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12409592] (LW) [Entered: 03/31/2022 09:35 AM]
March 23, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Lalitaben N. Patel, Nanubhai M. Patel, Vimal Nanu Patel and Vimal, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/30/2022. Appellants Lalitaben N. Patel, Nanubhai M. Patel, Vimal Nanu Patel and Vimal, Inc. opening brief due 05/23/2022. Appellees City of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department answering brief due 06/20/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12402626] (JMR) [Entered: 03/23/2022 10:32 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nanubhai Patel, et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: NANUBHAI M. PATEL
Represented By: Frank Alan Weiser Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LALITABEN N. PATEL
Represented By: Frank Alan Weiser Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: VIMAL NANU PATEL
Represented By: Frank Alan Weiser Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: VIMAL, INC., a California corporation
Represented By: Frank Alan Weiser Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal corporation
Represented By: Amber A. Logan
Represented By: Henry Patrick Nelson Esquire
Represented By: Blithe Smith Bock
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Represented By: Amber A. Logan
Represented By: Henry Patrick Nelson Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?