Beyond Blond Productions, LLC v. Edward Heldman, III, et al
Plaintiff: BEYOND BLOND PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a California limited liability company
Defendant: EDWARD HELDMAN III, an individual, COMEDYMX, INC., a Nevada corporation and COMEDYMX, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
3Rd Party Defendant: MICHELLE JUSTICE
Case Number: 22-55334
Filed: April 4, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 9, 2022 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties are directed to address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Koninklijke Philips Elecs. N.V. v. KXD Tech., Inc., 539 F.3d 1039, 1042 (9th Cir. 2008) (noting that court has jurisdiction under 1291 over interlocutory appeals from criminalbut not civilcontempt orders); see also Jensen Elec. Co. v. Moore, Caldwell, Rowland & Dodd, Inc., 873 F.2d 1327, 1329 (9th Cir. 1989) (concluding that an order imposing sanctions without setting the amount of the sanction was not a final or appealable order). The established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12441772] (WL) [Entered: 05/09/2022 02:15 PM]
April 27, 2022 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. Counsel may contact Circuit Mediator to discuss services available through the Circuit Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [12432304] (VS) [Entered: 04/27/2022 10:55 AM]
April 21, 2022 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/21/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12427749]. [22-55334] (AD) [Entered: 04/21/2022 12:44 PM]
April 21, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Comedymx, Inc., ComedyMX, LLC and Edward Heldman, III Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/21/2022. [12427709] [22-55334] (Newman, Randall) [Entered: 04/21/2022 12:24 PM]
April 14, 2022 Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12421292] (LW) [Entered: 04/14/2022 11:26 AM]
April 4, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants ComedyMX, LLC, Comedymx, Inc. and Edward Heldman III Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/11/2022. Transcript ordered by 05/02/2022. Transcript due 06/01/2022. Appellants ComedyMX, LLC, Comedymx, Inc. and Edward Heldman III opening brief due 07/11/2022. Appellee Beyond Blond Productions, LLC answering brief due 08/11/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12412318] (RT) [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:55 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Beyond Blond Productions, LLC v. Edward Heldman, III, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: BEYOND BLOND PRODUCTIONS, LLC, a California limited liability company
Represented By: Milord A. Keshishian Esquire
Represented By: Jordan M. Zim
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: EDWARD HELDMAN III, an individual
Represented By: Gregory N. Albright
Represented By: Kevin Andrew Kent Esquire
Represented By: Randall Scott Newman
Represented By: Meir Joseph Westreich Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMEDYMX, INC., a Nevada corporation
Represented By: Gregory N. Albright
Represented By: Kevin Andrew Kent Esquire
Represented By: Randall Scott Newman
Represented By: Meir Joseph Westreich Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMEDYMX, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Represented By: Gregory N. Albright
Represented By: Kevin Andrew Kent Esquire
Represented By: Randall Scott Newman
Represented By: Meir Joseph Westreich Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
3rd party defendant: MICHELLE JUSTICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?