USA v. Charles Le Beau, et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES PAUL LE BEAU
Defendant / Appellee: VICTORIA J. LE BEAU, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, MERCK & CO., INC., WILLIAM O. DOUGHERTY, JOSEPH KELLY and CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
Case Number: 22-55349
Filed: April 6, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Tax Suits
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2022 Filing 4 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and PAUL J. WATFORD) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Medhekar v. United States Dist. Court, 99 F.3d 325, 326 (9th Cir. 1996) (discovery orders not immediately appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12429304] (OC) [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:39 PM]
April 11, 2022 Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Robert Joseph Wille Jr. for party(s) Appellee USA, in case 22-55349. [12417205] (JFF) [Entered: 04/11/2022 11:45 AM]
April 11, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Robert J. Wille (lead counsel) (U.S. Department of Justice, P.O. Box 502, Washington, D.C. 20044) for Appellee USA. Date of service: 04/11/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12416888] [22-55349] (Wille, Robert) [Entered: 04/11/2022 09:32 AM]
April 6, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 05/06/2022. Transcript due 06/06/2022. Appellant Charles Paul Le Beau opening brief due 07/12/2022. Appellees Bank of America, N.A., California Franchise Tax Board, County of San Diego, William O. Dougherty, Joseph Kelly, Victoria J. Le Beau, Merck & Co., Inc., State of California and United States of America answering brief due 08/12/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12414054] (RT) [Entered: 04/06/2022 01:01 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Charles Le Beau, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Jessica S. Reimelt
Represented By: Robert Joseph Wille Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CHARLES PAUL LE BEAU
Represented By: Charles Paul Le Beau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VICTORIA J. LE BEAU
Represented By: Victoria J. Le Beau
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Represented By: Megan E. Lees
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
Represented By: Walter Joseph de Lorrell Esquire III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MERCK & CO., INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WILLIAM O. DOUGHERTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOSEPH KELLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
Represented By: Lisa W. Chao
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?