Dayvon Smith v. Stu Sherman
Petitioner / Appellant: DAYVON LAMAR SMITH
Respondent / Appellee: STU SHERMAN
Case Number: 22-55379
Filed: April 13, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2022 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Dayvon Lamar Smith motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/30/2022. [12467790] (QDL) [Entered: 06/09/2022 03:36 PM]
April 13, 2022 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/08/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12420371] (WL) [Entered: 04/13/2022 02:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dayvon Smith v. Stu Sherman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: DAYVON LAMAR SMITH
Represented By: Dayvon Lamar Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: STU SHERMAN
Represented By: Ana R. Duarte
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?