Leda DaSilva-Flint v. Louis DeJoy
LEDA M. DASILVA-FLINT |
LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General |
22-55382 |
April 14, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
LEDA DASILVA-FLINT V. LOUIS DEJOY |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12466538] (CL) [Entered: 06/08/2022 01:30 PM] |
Filing 8 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 06/08/2022. See order for details. [12455532] (CL) [Entered: 05/24/2022 04:47 PM] |
Filing 7 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Entered in error. [12455126] (CL) [Entered: 05/24/2022 01:48 PM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/24/2022, 11:30 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12430779] (CL) [Entered: 04/26/2022 08:10 AM] |
Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/21/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12428309]. [22-55382] (AD) [Entered: 04/21/2022 06:44 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Leda M. DaSilva-Flint Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/21/2022. [12427765] [22-55382] (Schutzman, Scott) [Entered: 04/21/2022 12:58 PM] |
Filing 3 Attorney Damon Thayer substituted by Attorney Jessica O. Cheh. [12426932] (RL) [Entered: 04/20/2022 03:53 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jessica O. Cheh (United States Attorney's Office, 300 N. Los Angeles Street, Rm. 7516, Los Angeles, CA 90012) for Appellee Louis DeJoy. Substitution for Attorney Damon Thayer for Appellee Louis DeJoy. Date of service: 04/20/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12426899] [22-55382] (Cheh, Jessica) [Entered: 04/20/2022 03:40 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Leda M. DaSilva-Flint Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/21/2022. Transcript ordered by 05/13/2022. Transcript due 06/13/2022. Appellant Leda M. DaSilva-Flint opening brief due 07/22/2022. Appellee Louis DeJoy answering brief due 08/22/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12421260] (RT) [Entered: 04/14/2022 11:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Leda DaSilva-Flint v. Louis DeJoy | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: LEDA M. DASILVA-FLINT | |
Represented By: | Scott E. Schutzman Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General | |
Represented By: | Damon Thayer |
Represented By: | Jessica O. Cheh |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.