K.J.P., et al v. County of San Diego, et al
| KIMBERLY NANG CHANTHAPHANH, individually |
| SAN DIEGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, DEAN ALLEN, Sheriff's Department deputy (#4591), AARON BROOKE, Sheriff's Department corporal (#2820), SANDRA CARBAJAL, (Janet) Sheriff's Department deputy (#3141), MARCOS COLLINS, Sheriff's Department corporal (#7127), JANAE KRULL, Sheriff's Department deputy (#0072), MICHAEL LEE, Sheriff's Department deputy (#6227), JENNY MARTINSON, Sheriff's Department deputy (#0601), TAMANI PUGH, Sheriff's Department deputy (#7231), JOVONNI SILVA, Sheriff's Department deputy (# 2586), BILLY TENNISON III, Sheriff's Department deputy (#4986), WILLIAM GORE, San Diego Sheriff, UNKNOWN SAN DIEGO SHERIFF'S DEPUTIES, CITY OF SANTEE, SANTEE FIRE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD MATTICK, Santee Fire Department Chief, AARON BAGLEY, Santee Fire Department Fire Captain, UNKNOWN SANTEE FIRE DEPARTMENT CREWMEMBERS, LAKESIDE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT, ANDY PARR, Lakeside Fire Protection District Chief, MARC POYNTER, firefighter/paramedic for the District, AARON HACKETT, firefighter/paramedic for the Santee Fire Department, DAVID CSIK, firefighter/paramedic for the District, UNKNOWN LAKESIDE FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CREWMEMBERS, KEVIN RALPH, Sheriff's Department sergeant (#3519), AARON DO, firefighter/engineer for the Santee Fire Department, ADAM DANIELS, firefighter/paremedic for the Santee Fire Department and DANIEL NEOW, firefighter/paramedic for the Santee Fire Department |
| K.J.P., a minor, individually, by and through their mother, Loan Thi Minh Nguyen, K.P.P., a minor, individually, by and through their mother, Loan Thi Minh Nguyen and LOAN THI MINH NGUYEN, who also sues individually and as successor in interest to her now deceased husband, Lucky Phounsy |
| COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO and RICHARD FISCHER, Sheriff's Department deputy (#3003) |
| 22-55392 |
| April 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): On or before June 15, 2022, counsel for appellants shall provide a status report by email to all counsel and the Circuit Mediator (Robert_Kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov). This report may be combined with the report due the same date in Ninth Circuit Case no. 22-55216. Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. The status report should not be filed with the court. [12445334] (ABT) [Entered: 05/12/2022 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): On April 22, 2022, this court stayed proceedings in this appeal pending the district courts disposition of pending post-judgment motions. Appellants then filed a motion seeking the same stay of appellate proceedings. The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is denied as moot. Proceedings in this appeal remain stayed. Appellants remain obligated to comply with the courts April 22, 2022 order. [12432699] (AF) [Entered: 04/27/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant County of San Diego Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/25/2022. [12430541] [22-55392] (Michalowski, Jeffrey) [Entered: 04/25/2022 04:21 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/25/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12430067]. [22-55392] (AD) [Entered: 04/25/2022 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Richard Fischer Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/25/2022. [12429897] [22-55392] (Renick, Steven) [Entered: 04/25/2022 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant County of San Diego Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 04/22/2022. [12429274]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [2].] (SLM) [Entered: 04/22/2022 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of timely filed motions listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, appellate proceedings other than mediation will be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motions. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling(s) on the pending motions, appellants must notify this court in writing and advise whether appellants intend to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling(s) on the post-judgment motions, appellants must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk will serve this order on the district court. [12428772] (TSP) [Entered: 04/22/2022 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 4 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant County of San Diego response to Court order dated 04/18/2022. Date of service: 04/22/2022. [12428596] [22-55392] (Michalowski, Jeffrey) [Entered: 04/22/2022 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants County of San Diego and Richard Fischer Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/25/2022. Transcript ordered by 05/18/2022. Transcript due 06/17/2022. Appellants County of San Diego and Richard Fischer opening brief due 07/27/2022. Appellees K.J.P., K.P.P. and Loan Thi Minh Nguyen answering brief due 08/29/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12424752] (RT) [Entered: 04/18/2022 04:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
