M. R., et al v. City of Los Angeles, et al
| M. A. R., a minor by and through his Guardian ad Litem Elisabeth Barragan, individually, and as a successor in interest to Daniel Rivera and SILVIA IMELDA RIVERA, individually |
| CITY OF LOS ANGELES, MICHEL MOORE, Police Chief in his individual and official capacity, BRET BECKSTROM, Officer, TYLER MOSER, Officer, MICHAEL LOPEZ, Officer, NATHAN RAMOS, Officer and ANGEL ROMERO, Officer |
| 22-55415 |
| April 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| M. R., ET AL V. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants M. A. R. and Silvia Imelda Rivera response to order to show cause dated 04/27/2022. Date of service: 05/18/2022. [12450826] [22-55415] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect content of filing. 05/19/2022 by TYL] (DeSimone, Vincent) [Entered: 05/18/2022 06:09 PM] |
| Filing 8 Attorneys Christian R. Bojorquez, Christian R. Bojorquez and Christian R. Bojorquez in 22-55415 substituted by Attorneys Michael Martin Walsh, Michael Martin Walsh and Michael Martin Walsh in 22-55415 [12446088] (DJV) [Entered: 05/13/2022 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michael M. Walsh (Los Angeles City Attorneys Office) for Appellees Bret Beckstrom, City of Los Angeles, Michael Lopez, Michel Moore, Tyler Moser, Nathan Ramos and Angel Romero. Substitution for Attorney Christian R. Bojorquez, Esquire for Appellees City of Los Angeles, Michel Moore and Nathan Ramos. Date of service: 05/13/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12446053] [22-55415] (Walsh, Michael) [Entered: 05/13/2022 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12443306] (CL) [Entered: 05/10/2022 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 05/10/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12437497] (BLS) [Entered: 05/03/2022 06:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/29/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12435287]. [22-55415] (AD) [Entered: 04/29/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants M. A. R. and Silvia Imelda Rivera Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/29/2022. [12435124] [22-55415] (DeSimone, Vincent) [Entered: 04/29/2022 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable under 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Rule 54(b)). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12432352] (AF) [Entered: 04/27/2022 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants M. A. R. and Silvia Imelda Rivera Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/29/2022. Appellants M. A. R. and Silvia Imelda Rivera opening brief due 06/24/2022. Appellees Bret Beckstrom, City of Los Angeles, Michael Lopez, Michel Moore, Tyler Moser, Nathan Ramos and Angel Romero answering brief due 07/25/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12429197] (RT) [Entered: 04/22/2022 03:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
