Ray Weisbein v. Allergan USA, Inc., et al
Defendant: ALLERGAN, INC., a Delaware corporation, TARA CAPALBO and ANDREW BARTON
Plaintiff / Appellant: RAY WEISBEIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Case Number: 22-55425
Filed: April 27, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2022 Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: RGA) Appellants motion to dismiss this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12458762] (WL) [Entered: 05/27/2022 03:34 PM]
May 23, 2022 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ray Weisbein Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 05/23/2022. [12454353] [22-55425] (Milian, David) [Entered: 05/23/2022 04:41 PM]
May 11, 2022 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/11/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12444157]. [22-55425] (AD) [Entered: 05/11/2022 12:44 PM]
May 11, 2022 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Ray Weisbein Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/11/2022. [12443718] [22-55425] (Milian, David) [Entered: 05/11/2022 09:26 AM]
May 6, 2022 Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12440801] (LW) [Entered: 05/06/2022 03:45 PM]
May 2, 2022 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: WL): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable under 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with Rule 54(b)). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12436232] (WL) [Entered: 05/02/2022 03:02 PM]
April 27, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ray Weisbein Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/04/2022. Appellant Ray Weisbein opening brief due 06/27/2022. Appellee Allergan USA, Inc. answering brief due 07/27/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12432389] (JBS) [Entered: 04/27/2022 11:30 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ray Weisbein v. Allergan USA, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RAY WEISBEIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Robert Rafael Ahdoot Esquire
Represented By: Bradley Keith King
Represented By: David Philip Milian
Represented By: Christopher Stiner
Represented By: Tina Wolfson Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ALLERGAN USA, INC.
Represented By: Raymond A. Cardozo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALLERGAN, INC., a Delaware corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TARA CAPALBO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW BARTON
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?