Francisco Garcia v. County of Los Angeles, et al
| FRANCISCO GARCIA |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff Los Angeles County, in individual capacity and official capacity, PEREZ, Registered Nurse, in individual capacity, PERALTA, Sheriff Deputy, in individual capacity, YHAMEL, Sheriff Deputy, in individual capacity, TIPTON, Grievance Officer, individual capacity, HINTON, Legal Unit Coordinator, individual capacity, URSO, Supervisor, individual capacity, GULSETH, Supervisor, individual capacity and JOHN DOES |
| 22-55437 |
| May 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (JOHN B. OWENS, KENNETH K. LEE and PATRICK J. BUMATAY) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; McCall v. Deeds, 849 F.2d 1259 (9th Cir. 1988) (denial of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) certification is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12474301] (WL) [Entered: 06/17/2022 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Francisco Garcia opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 06/02/2022. [12465577] (SML) [Entered: 06/07/2022 01:54 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Francisco Garcia opening brief due 06/20/2022. [12436796] (JMR) [Entered: 05/03/2022 10:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
