Silas Peterson v. USA
SILAS BERNARD PETERSON |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
22-55490 |
May 16, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Silas Bernard Peterson Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 06/20/2022. [12474950] [22-55490] (Windsor, Mark) [Entered: 06/20/2022 03:07 PM] |
Filing 2 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mark Windsor for Silas Bernard Peterson) [12449363] (JN) [Entered: 05/17/2022 04:01 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 05/13/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12447767] (OC) [Entered: 05/16/2022 11:42 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Silas Peterson v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: SILAS BERNARD PETERSON | |
Represented By: | Mark Windsor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Claire Kelly |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.