Jessica Ponkey v. LLR, Inc., et al
JESSICA PONKEY, individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons |
LLR, INC., a Wyoming corporation, LULAROE, LLC, a California limited liability company, LENNON LEASING, LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company, MARK A. STIDHAM, DEANNE S. BRADY, AKA Deanne Stidham and DOES, 1-30, inclusive |
22-55532 |
May 31, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Fraud |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
JESSICA PONKEY V. LLR, INC., ET AL |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12497651] (CL) [Entered: 07/19/2022 03:49 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): The record and the response to this courts June 15, 2022, order to show cause reflect that the district court has entered an order confirming the final arbitration award, and that an amended notice of appeal has been filed to include the confirmation order. Accordingly, the order to show cause is discharged, the notice of appeal is so amended, and briefing in this appeal will proceed. The opening brief and excerpts of record are due August 16, 2022. The answering brief is due September 15, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. (MOATT) [12496585] (AF) [Entered: 07/18/2022 04:12 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jessica Ponkey response to order to show cause dated 06/15/2022. Date of service: 07/06/2022. [12487937] [22-55532] (Gamarnik, Kevin) [Entered: 07/06/2022 07:14 PM] |
Filing 7 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court, filed 06/29/2022. [12482929] (HH) [Entered: 06/29/2022 10:49 AM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 07/19/2022, 1:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [12471983] (CL) [Entered: 06/15/2022 01:41 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (A district court order is . . . not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981))); see also 9 U.S.C. 16; Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc., 483 F.3d 956, 961-62 (9th Cir. 2007) (discussing appealability of orders compelling arbitration). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12471964] (WL) [Entered: 06/15/2022 01:32 PM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 06/14/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12465759] (CL) [Entered: 06/07/2022 03:02 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/03/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12463547]. [22-55532] (AD) [Entered: 06/03/2022 06:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jessica Ponkey Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/03/2022. [12463441] [22-55532] (Gamarnik, Kevin) [Entered: 06/03/2022 04:25 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jessica Ponkey Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/07/2022. Appellant Jessica Ponkey opening brief due 07/26/2022. Appellees Deanne S. Brady, Does, LLR, Inc., Lennon Leasing, LLC, LuLaRoe, LLC and Mark A. Stidham answering brief due 08/25/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12459888] (JMR) [Entered: 05/31/2022 01:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.