Alex Salaverria v. State of California, et al
| ALEX ALFONSO SALAVERRIA |
| STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of California, ERIC GARCETTI, Mayor of Los Angeles, GEORGE GASCON, Los Angeles District Attorney, MICHAEL MOORE, Chief, Los Angeles Police Department, LA HOMELAND SECURITY TEAM, ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff, JAMES TRATEAU, Captain, Los Angeles Sheriffs Department and DOES, Involved Investigators; Officers Involved |
| 22-55559 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil (Rico) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): Appellants motion for a continuance (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is treated as a motion for an extension of time to respond to the courts June 7, 2022 order to show cause. The motion is granted. Appellants response to the June 7, 2022 order to show cause is now due August 30, 2022. To the extent appellant wishes to stay this appeal indefinitely, the request is denied. If appellant fails to file a response by August 30, 2022, this court may resolve the order to show cause based on the record. Briefing remains suspended. [12496255] (OC) [Entered: 07/18/2022 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Alex Alfonso Salaverria EMERGENCY Motion to continue hearing of case. Date of service: 06/29/2022. [12483466] [22-55559] (Salaverria, Alex) [Entered: 06/29/2022 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court denied appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis because it found that the action was frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12465381] (CKP) [Entered: 06/07/2022 11:55 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Alex Alfonso Salaverria opening brief due 08/08/2022. [12464161] (RT) [Entered: 06/06/2022 11:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
