John Shaw, et al v. W. Scott Griffiths, et al
| ULTIMATE FRANCHISES, INC., a California corporation, ULTIMATE BRANDS, INC., a California corporation, 2ULITIMATEBRANDS, a California corporation, RON LOVE, an individual and BRIGITTE LOVE THEWES, an individual |
| JOHN K. SHAW, an individual, MIDORI G. SHAW, an individual and SHIPSHAPE COLLECTIVE OF FITCHBURG, LLC, a Wisconsin limited liability company |
| W. SCOTT GRIFFITHS, an individual and LORETTA HWONG GRIFFITHS, an individual |
| 22-55574 |
| June 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Franchise |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants John K. Shaw, Midori G. Shaw and Shipshape Collective of Fitchburg, LLC response to order to show cause dated 06/24/2022. Date of service: 06/24/2022. [12500453] [22-55574] (Gurnick, David) [Entered: 07/22/2022 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants John K. Shaw, Midori G. Shaw and Shipshape Collective of Fitchburg, LLC response to order to show cause dated 06/24/2022. Date of service: 07/15/2022. [12495410] [22-55574] (Gurnick, David) [Entered: 07/15/2022 10:57 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the judgment appealed from may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (A district court order is . . . not appealable [under 1291] unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981))). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12479235] (JMR) [Entered: 06/24/2022 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 07/07/2022. Transcript due 08/08/2022. Appellants John K. Shaw, Midori G. Shaw and Shipshape Collective of Fitchburg, LLC opening brief due 09/15/2022. Appellees Loretta Hwong Griffiths and W. Scott Griffiths answering brief due 10/17/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12466973] (JBS) [Entered: 06/08/2022 05:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
