Marcus Ellington v. R. Johnson
MARCUS RUBEN ELLINGTON |
R. C. JOHNSON, Warden |
22-55577 |
June 9, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Marcus Ruben Ellington motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/22/2022. [12481229] (QDL) [Entered: 06/27/2022 04:45 PM] |
Filing 2 Received copy of District Court order filed on 06/16/2022 denying certificate of appealability. [12474286] (QDL) [Entered: 06/17/2022 01:50 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 05/24/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12467285] (OC) [Entered: 06/09/2022 10:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Marcus Ellington v. R. Johnson | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: MARCUS RUBEN ELLINGTON | |
Represented By: | Marcus Ruben Ellington |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: R. C. JOHNSON, Warden | |
Represented By: | Herbert S. Tetef |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.