John Penny v. City of Los Angeles, et al
| SAMI AZMY, JONATHAN A. CONCETTI and DOES, 7-10 |
| JOHN SYLVESTER PENNY |
| CITY OF LOS ANGELES, MICHAEL MOORE, Chief of Police, DANIEL ANTALEK, BLAIR A. SPRAGGINS, ANTONIO ROBLES, LAWRENCE PARKS and MIGUEL LARA |
| 22-55579 |
| June 9, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Added Attorney(s) Jonathan H Eisenman for party(s) Appellant Miguel Lara, Appellant Michael Moore, Appellant City of Los Angeles, Appellant Lawrence Parks, Appellant Daniel Antalek, Appellant Antonio Robles and Appellant Blair A. Spraggins, in case 22-55579. [12482176] (QDL) [Entered: 06/28/2022 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jonathan H. Eisenman (Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, 200 No. Spring Street, 14th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90012) for Appellants Daniel Antalek, City of Los Angeles, Miguel Lara, Michael Moore, Lawrence Parks, Antonio Robles and Blair A. Spraggins. Date of service: 06/28/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12482109] [22-55579] (Eisenman, Jonathan) [Entered: 06/28/2022 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 07/12/2022, 11:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [12480754] [22-55572, 22-55579] (VS) [Entered: 06/27/2022 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/24/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12479930]. [22-55579] (AD) [Entered: 06/24/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Daniel Antalek, Miguel Lara, Michael Moore, Lawrence Parks, Antonio Robles, Blair A. Spraggins and Appellee John Sylvester Penny Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/24/2022. [12479649] [22-55579] (Bock, Blithe) [Entered: 06/24/2022 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 Attorneys Cory Michael Brente, Michael Nelson Feuer, Scott D. Marcus in 22-55579 substituted by Attorney Blithe Smith Bock in 22-55579. [12479630] (QDL) [Entered: 06/24/2022 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Blithe Smith Bock (Los Angeles City Attorney's Office, 200 No. Spring Street, 14th Floor, City Hall, Los Angeles, CA 90012) for Appellants Daniel Antalek, City of Los Angeles, Miguel Lara, Michael Moore, Lawrence Parks, Antonio Robles and Blair A. Spraggins. Substitution for Cory Michael Brente for Appellants Daniel Antalek, City of Los Angeles, Miguel Lara, Michael Moore, Lawrence Parks, Antonio Robles and Blair A. Spraggins, Michael Nelson Feuer, Esquire for Appellants Daniel Antalek, City of Los Angeles, Miguel Lara, Michael Moore, Lawrence Parks, Antonio Robles and Blair A. Spraggins and Scott D. Marcus, Esquire for Appellants Daniel Antalek, City of Los Angeles, Miguel Lara, Michael Moore, Lawrence Parks, Antonio Robles and Blair A. Spraggins. Date of service: 06/24/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12479610] [22-55579] (Bock, Blithe) [Entered: 06/24/2022 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): These appeals challenge the district courts May 10, 2022 order denying qualified immunity to appellants Concetti, Antalek, Robles, and Spraggins. In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties are directed to address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over these appeals as to all appellants, particularly those appellants as to whom the challenged order did not deny qualified immunity. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Ballou v. McElvain, 29 F.4th 413, 428 (9th Cir. 2022) (Our jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine is limited to reviewing a denial of qualified immunity.); see also Dougherty v. City of Covina, 654 F.3d 892, 900 (9th Cir. 2011) (Qualified immunity does not shield municipalities from liability.). The opening briefs and excerpts of record are due September 16, 2022. The answering briefs are due October 17, 2022. The optional reply briefs are due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12478740] [22-55572, 22-55579] (JBS) [Entered: 06/23/2022 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12478142] (LW) [Entered: 06/23/2022 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Daniel Antalek, City of Los Angeles, Miguel Lara, Michael Moore, Lawrence Parks, Antonio Robles and Blair A. Spraggins Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/16/2022. Transcript ordered by 07/08/2022. Transcript due 08/08/2022. Appellants Daniel Antalek, City of Los Angeles, Miguel Lara, Michael Moore, Lawrence Parks, Antonio Robles and Blair A. Spraggins opening brief due 09/16/2022. Appellee John Sylvester Penny answering brief due 10/17/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12467694] (JBS) [Entered: 06/09/2022 02:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
