David Lack v. Matthew Rodriguez
| DAVID JAMES LACK |
| MATTHEW RODRIGUEZ, Acting Attorney General of California |
| 22-55583 |
| June 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant David James Lack Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 07/18/2022. [12496736] [22-55583] (Hein, Devon) [Entered: 07/18/2022 11:28 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 05/13/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12470737] (OC) [Entered: 06/14/2022 11:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: David Lack v. Matthew Rodriguez | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: DAVID JAMES LACK | |
| Represented By: | Devon Lashae Hein |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: MATTHEW RODRIGUEZ, Acting Attorney General of California | |
| Represented By: | Julie Ann Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
