Manisha Penesa v. Shawn Brown, et al
| CALIFORNIA INSTITUTION FOR WOMEN, JAMES A. BROWN III, in individual capacity, K. HUGHES, Warden, in individual and official capacity, A. W. MARTEL, Warden, in individual and official capacity, DAVID LOPEZ, Correctional Sergeant, EDWARD WAMIL, Correctional Sergeant, Acting Lieutenant and MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden, Warden of C.I.W. |
| MANISHA L. PENESA |
| SHAWN BROWN, Peace-Officer, in individual capacity and REBECCA REYES, individual and official capacity |
| 22-55591 |
| June 16, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, CMC and DPC) [12511331] (NAC) [Entered: 08/08/2022 07:58 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS) : A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12495023] (RT) [Entered: 07/15/2022 02:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 07/13/2022. Transcript due 08/12/2022. Appellant Manisha L. Penesa opening brief due 09/21/2022. Appellees Shawn Brown and Rebecca Reyes answering brief due 10/21/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12473124] (JBS) [Entered: 06/16/2022 01:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.