Aaron Raiser v. Sheri Kleeger, et al
| AARON RAISER |
| SHERI S. KLEEGER, Court Reporter, USDC, BRUCE E. DISENHOUSE, Attorney, JAMES C. DUFF, Director, Administrative Office of the United States Courts and DOES, 1-25, inclusive |
| 22-55678 |
| July 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order entered in case number 14-80179. Appellants request for an extension of time to file an optional statement of issues, contained in the notice of appeal, is granted. Any statement of issues in support of the appeal is due within 60 days after the date of this order. This appeal will then be reviewed by the court to determine whether it will be permitted to proceed. Further requests for an extension of time to file a statement of issues in support of the appeal will be disfavored. A briefing schedule will be set by future court order only if the court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [12498015] (JMR) [Entered: 07/20/2022 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 14-80179. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [12494301] (RT) [Entered: 07/14/2022 04:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
