Peter Gellman, et al v. Andrea Hunsinger, et al
| PETER GELLMAN, an individual and PALMERSTON GROUP INDEMNITY SOLUTIONS, LLC, a New Jersey limited liability corporation |
| ANDREA HUNSINGER, an individual and ANDREA HUNSINGER JOLLY, AN INSURANCE SERVICES CORPORATION, a California corporation, DBA Advanced Wealth Plan |
| 22-55728 |
| August 1, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutes - Arbitration |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| PETER GELLMAN, ET AL V. ANDREA HUNSINGER, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ counsel for appellants only, 10/18/2022, 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12548298] (CL) [Entered: 09/23/2022 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED -. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows : Appellants Andrea Hunsinger Jolly, an Insurance Services Corporation and Andrea Hunsinger opening brief due 11/17/2022. Appellees Peter Gellman and Palmerston Group Indemnity Solutions, LLC answering brief due 12/19/2022. Appellants optional reply brief is due within twenty one 21 days from the service date of the answer brief. See order for details. [12536741] (VS) [Entered: 09/09/2022 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ counsel for appellants, 09/23/2022, 10:00 a.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12536324] (VS) [Entered: 09/08/2022 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 09/08/2022, 1:30 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12522978] (CL) [Entered: 08/22/2022 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 Deleted Incorrect Entry. Entered in error. [12522590] (CL) [Entered: 08/22/2022 12:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/17/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12519394]. [22-55728] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2022 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Andrea Hunsinger Jolly, an Insurance Services Corporation and Andrea Hunsinger Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/17/2022. [12519387] [22-55728] (Singh, Rupa) [Entered: 08/17/2022 11:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12518667] (BLS) [Entered: 08/17/2022 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Andrea Hunsinger Jolly, an Insurance Services Corporation and Andrea Hunsinger Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/08/2022. Appellants Andrea Hunsinger Jolly, an Insurance Services Corporation and Andrea Hunsinger opening brief due 10/03/2022. Appellees Peter Gellman and Palmerston Group Indemnity Solutions, LLC answering brief due 11/03/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12506226] (RT) [Entered: 08/01/2022 11:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
