Nouvel, LLC v. Mondo Bongo, LLC, et al
NOUVEL, LLC |
MONDO BONGO, LLC, WILLIAM BRADLEY PITT and WARREN GRANT |
In re: EX PARTE APPLICATION OF NOUVEL, LLC, For an Order Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1782 Granting Leave to Obtain Discovery from Mondo Bongo, LLC, William Bradley Pitt, and Warren Grant for Use in Foreign Proceedings |
22-55737 |
August 3, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: GS) The parties stipulated motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 15 ]) for voluntary dismissal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Costs and fees shall be allocated pursuant to the parties stipulation. This order served on the district court acts as the mandate of this court. [12566180] (WL) [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:35 AM] |
Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Appellants Warren Grant, Mondo Bongo, LLC and William Bradley Pitt Stipulated Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 10/17/2022. [12564771] [22-55737] (Brill, Laura) [Entered: 10/17/2022 11:12 AM] |
Filing 14 Streamlined request [13] by Appellants Warren Grant, Mondo Bongo, LLC and William Bradley Pitt to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Warren Grant, Mondo Bongo, LLC and William Bradley Pitt opening brief due 11/03/2022. Appellee Nouvel, LLC answering brief due 12/05/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12553787] (JN) [Entered: 09/30/2022 03:39 PM] |
Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Warren Grant, Mondo Bongo, LLC and William Bradley Pitt. New requested due date is 11/03/2022. [12553461] [22-55737] (Brill, Laura) [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:50 PM] |
Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12528464] (CL) [Entered: 08/29/2022 12:21 PM] |
Filing 11 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER and DANIELLE J. FORREST) Appellants motion to stay the district courts July 22, 2022 order pending appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009). The briefing schedule established previously remains in effect. [12518984] (WL) [Entered: 08/17/2022 01:53 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellants Warren Grant, Mondo Bongo, LLC and William Bradley Pitt reply to response (motion to stay lower court action, ). Date of service: 08/12/2022. [12516429] [22-55737] (Brill, Laura) [Entered: 08/12/2022 11:40 PM] |
Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 08/26/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12516317] (CL) [Entered: 08/12/2022 03:57 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Nouvel, LLC response opposing motion ([ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 2 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to stay lower court action). Date of service: 08/10/2022. [12514571] [22-55737] (Hummel, Keith) [Entered: 08/10/2022 11:51 PM] |
Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/10/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12514112]. [22-55737] (AD) [Entered: 08/10/2022 12:44 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Warren Grant, Mondo Bongo, LLC and William Bradley Pitt Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/10/2022. [12513968] [22-55737] (Brill, Laura) [Entered: 08/10/2022 11:20 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): The court has received appellants emergency motion, requesting relief by August 17, 2022. The opposition to the emergency motion is due August 10, 2022. The optional reply is due August 12, 2022. [12509495] (WL) [Entered: 08/04/2022 11:32 AM] |
Filing 4 Added Attorney Prashanth Chennakesavan for Appellee Nouvel, LLC, in case 22-55737. [12509285] (HH) [Entered: 08/04/2022 09:27 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Prashanth Chennakesavan (LTL Attorneys LLP, 300 S. Grand Ave., 14th Floor, Los Angles, CA 90071) for Appellee Nouvel, LLC. Date of service: 08/04/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12509250] [22-55737] (Chennakesavan, Prashanth) [Entered: 08/04/2022 09:08 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Warren Grant, Mondo Bongo, LLC and William Bradley Pitt EMERGENCY Motion to stay lower court action. Date of service: 08/03/2022. [12509143] [22-55737] (Brill, Laura) [Entered: 08/03/2022 11:51 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Warren Grant, Mondo Bongo, LLC and William Bradley Pitt Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/10/2022. Appellants Warren Grant, Mondo Bongo, LLC and William Bradley Pitt opening brief due 10/04/2022. Appellee Nouvel, LLC answering brief due 11/04/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12508942] (RT) [Entered: 08/03/2022 03:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.