R. Kulick v. United States Bankruptcy Court, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: R. J. KULICK
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, Central District of CA, Northern Division, HOWARD I. CAMHI, JEFF F. TCHAKAROV, MICHELMAN AND ROBINSON, LLC and DOES, 1-100, inclusive
Case Number: 22-55750
Filed: August 10, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 21, 2022 Filing 5 Filed order (DANIEL A. BRESS and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) Appellants emergency motion for an injunction (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is denied. Briefing is complete. [12546241] (OC) [Entered: 09/21/2022 04:53 PM]
August 24, 2022 Filing 4 Filed Appellant R. J. Kulick FORM 27 Emergency motion for injunction. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/22/2022. [12525716] (RL) [Entered: 08/24/2022 03:59 PM]
August 24, 2022 Filing 3 Filed original and 6 copies of Appellant R. J. Kulick opening brief of 7 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 08/22/2022. [12525616] (KWG) [Entered: 08/24/2022 03:26 PM]
August 19, 2022 Filing 2 Streamlined request by Appellant R. J. Kulick to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant R. J. Kulick opening brief due 11/10/2022. [12521615] (JN) [Entered: 08/19/2022 03:34 PM]
August 10, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant R. J. Kulick opening brief due 10/11/2022. [12514087] (RT) [Entered: 08/10/2022 12:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: R. Kulick v. United States Bankruptcy Court, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: R. J. KULICK
Represented By: R. J. Kulick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT, Central District of CA, Northern Division
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HOWARD I. CAMHI
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JEFF F. TCHAKAROV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHELMAN AND ROBINSON, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1-100, inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?