Teamlab, Inc. v. Museum of Dream Space, LLC, et al
| TEAMLAB, INC., a Japanese corporation |
| MUSEUM OF DREAM SPACE, LLC, a California limited liability company and DAHOOO AMERICAN CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation |
| 22-55757 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Copyright |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 10/26/2022, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12540530] (CL) [Entered: 09/14/2022 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Daniel C. Posner for party(s) Appellant Teamlab, Inc., in case 22-55757. [12539394] (BJK) [Entered: 09/13/2022 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Daniel C Posner (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017) for Appellant Teamlab, Inc.. Date of service: 09/13/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12539314] [22-55757] (Posner, Daniel) [Entered: 09/13/2022 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) John Wall Baumann for party(s) Appellant Teamlab, Inc., in case 22-55757. [12538674] (BJK) [Entered: 09/12/2022 05:35 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of John Wall Baumann (Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, 865 S. Figueroa St., 10th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017) for Appellant Teamlab, Inc.. Date of service: 09/12/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12538565] [22-55757] (Baumann, John) [Entered: 09/12/2022 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4). The notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, appellate proceedings other than mediation shall be held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 7 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall notify this court in writing of the ruling and shall advise whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [12527158] (TSP) [Entered: 08/26/2022 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 09/14/2022, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12525200] (CL) [Entered: 08/24/2022 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/19/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12521886]. [22-55757] (AD) [Entered: 08/19/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Teamlab, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/19/2022. [12521212] [22-55757] (Sholder, Scott) [Entered: 08/19/2022 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Teamlab, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/19/2022. Transcript ordered by 09/12/2022. Transcript due 10/11/2022. Appellant Teamlab, Inc. opening brief due 11/21/2022. Appellees Dahooo American Corporation and Museum of Dream Space, LLC answering brief due 12/21/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12515870] (RT) [Entered: 08/12/2022 11:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Teamlab, Inc. v. Museum of Dream Space, LLC, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: TEAMLAB, INC., a Japanese corporation | |
| Represented By: | Scott Jonathan Sholder |
| Represented By: | Nancy E. Wolff |
| Represented By: | John Wall Baumann |
| Represented By: | Daniel C. Posner Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MUSEUM OF DREAM SPACE, LLC, a California limited liability company | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence M. Hadley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DAHOOO AMERICAN CORPORATION, an Illinois corporation | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence M. Hadley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
