Arsen Manson v. State of California, et al
| ARSEN MANSON |
| STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CITY OF LOS ANGELES, CITY OF LANCASTER, JOHN DOE, STEVE OWEN, Sgt, Lancaster Sherrif's Station, individual capacity, LARRY PICO, Deputy Sheriff; Lancaster Sheriff's Station, individual capacity, JOHN B. EVANS, District Attorney Antelope Valley Courthouse, individual capacity, JOHN F. KRATTLI, County of Los Angeles office of the County Counsel, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS, DEEANA JANG, Chief Federal Coordinator Civil Rights Division, BERNIE C. LAFORTEZA, Antelope Valley Courthouse Judge, SHANNON KNIGHT, Judge, LISA MANGAY CHUNG, Judge, CHANEY, Acting P.J. Second Appeal Court Judge, PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, Chief Judge of U.S. Central District Court, SHERI PYM, Magistrate Judge U.S. Central District Court, STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Edward Williams Investigator, individual capacity, GERALD A. ENGLER, Chief Assistant Attorney General, COREY J. ROBINS, Deputy Attorney General, BETTY T. YEE, State of California Controller Board Member, SHARY MINARD, Victim Advocate, ALEC BLAKELEY, Acting Director, Centralized Case Management Operations, STEVE OWEN, Sgt, Lancaster Sherrif's Station, official capacity and ROB BONTA, State of California Attorney General, individual and official capacity |
| 22-55758 |
| August 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., DANIEL A. BRESS and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) : A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court has not issued any orders that are final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. To the extent appellant seeks to challenge the district courts July 26, 2022 order on appeal, that order is not final or appealable. See WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12547371] (RT) [Entered: 09/22/2022 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Arsen Manson FORM 27 motion for workplace discrimination or other related problem. Deficiencies: None. Served on 08/24/2022. [12527715] (RL) [Entered: 08/26/2022 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Arsen Manson opening brief of 5 pages (Informal: No). Served on 08/24/2022. [12527604] (SML) [Entered: 08/26/2022 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12522762] (RL) [Entered: 08/22/2022 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Arsen Manson opening brief due 10/11/2022. [12516060] (RT) [Entered: 08/12/2022 01:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
