Strong Trading, Inc. v. Unique Designs, Inc., et al
Plaintiff: STRONG TRADING, INC., a California Corporation
Counter Claimant: UNIQUE DESIGNS, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, DBA SDIL Kiran Jewels
Counter Defendant: KURT CHEN, an individual
Case Number: 22-55759
Filed: August 12, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 20, 2024 STRONG TRADING, INC. V. UNIQUE DESIGNS, INC., ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2022 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 10/06/2022, 11:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12524594] (VS) [Entered: 08/24/2022 08:37 AM]
August 19, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/19/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12521887]. [22-55759] (AD) [Entered: 08/19/2022 06:44 PM]
August 19, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Unique Designs, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/19/2022. [12521325] [22-55759] (Singh, Yashdeep) [Entered: 08/19/2022 02:04 PM]
August 12, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Unique Designs, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/19/2022. Transcript ordered by 09/12/2022. Transcript due 10/11/2022. Appellant Unique Designs, Inc. opening brief due 11/21/2022. Appellees Kurt Chen and Strong Trading, Inc. answering brief due 12/21/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12516082] (RT) [Entered: 08/12/2022 01:29 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Strong Trading, Inc. v. Unique Designs, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: STRONG TRADING, INC., a California Corporation
Represented By: Jeffrey C.P. Wang Esquire
Represented By: Michael G. York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter claimant: UNIQUE DESIGNS, INC., a New Jersey Corporation, DBA SDIL Kiran Jewels
Represented By: Gerald S. Ohn
Represented By: Yashdeep Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Counter defendant: KURT CHEN, an individual
Represented By: Jeffrey C.P. Wang Esquire
Represented By: Michael G. York
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?