Ronald Cutright, et al v. CHP, et al
RONALD FRANK CUTRIGHT, DORIS FAYE CUTRIGHT and DORIS CUTRIGHT |
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, TELFINUES PRESZLER, Retired CHP, individual/official capacity, LANCE BERN, CHP, individual/official capacity, TIMOTHY NOYES, CHP, individual/official capacity, MICHAEL CRONSHEY, SHERLEE CRONSHEY, Mountain Auto Service and Towing Owners, individual, PRIVATE CITIZEN GARETH CHARLES NITCHMAN, individual and DOES |
22-55785 |
August 23, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Doris Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright. Date of service: 10/15/2022. [12564282] [22-55785]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached searchable PDF of the brief. 10/17/2022 by KWG] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 10/15/2022 02:49 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12559597] (CKP) [Entered: 10/11/2022 09:55 AM] |
Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright Correspondence: District Court documents. Date of service: 10/04/2022. [12555550] [22-55785]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 10/05/2022 by SLM] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 10/04/2022 11:34 AM] |
Filing 8 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 6 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright. Date of service: 09/25/2022. [12548679] [22-55785] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 09/25/2022 08:58 AM] |
Filing 7 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 6 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright. Date of service: 09/25/2022. [12548678] [22-55785] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 09/25/2022 08:50 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None [12547664]--[COURT UPDATE: attached exhibits. 09/26/2022 by SLM] (NAC) [Entered: 09/23/2022 10:29 AM] |
Filing 5 COURT DELETED DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 4 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright. Date of service: 09/21/2022. [12545746] [22-55785] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 09/21/2022 01:22 PM] |
Filing 4 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright and Doris Faye Cutright. Date of service: 09/21/2022. [12545706] [22-55785]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached PDF of the brief with exhibits filed in [5]. Removed PDF of the motion for appointment of counsel. 09/23/2022 by KWG] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 09/21/2022 12:59 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The conference previously scheduled for September 27, 2022, is canceled. This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12541455] (ABT) [Entered: 09/15/2022 02:52 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed order MEDIATION (VS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential. Participants with an email address on the attached list will receive an email with dial-in information. If an email address is not listed or if there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Participants may also leave a message at (415) 355-7900 to request dial-in information. Finally, please notify Circuit Mediator Robert Kaiser immediately by email (Robert_Kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) if a participant has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. Please copy all participants on any such communications. All emails should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All written or spoken communication with the mediator, including the discussions during the scheduled conference, are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. Additional information about confidentiality (including a copy of Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1), the assessment conference, and the Mediation Program are attached and can also be found at the Mediation Program website (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12534876] (RY) [Entered: 09/07/2022 11:29 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Ronald Frank Cutright opening brief due 10/18/2022. Appellees Lance Bern, California Highway Patrol, Michael Cronshey, Sherlee Cronshey, Does, Gareth Charles Nitchman, Timothy Noyes and Telfinues Preszler answering brief due 11/17/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12523754] (JBS) [Entered: 08/23/2022 10:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.