Ronald Cutright, et al v. CHP, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONALD FRANK CUTRIGHT, DORIS FAYE CUTRIGHT and DORIS CUTRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL, TELFINUES PRESZLER, Retired CHP, individual/official capacity, LANCE BERN, CHP, individual/official capacity, TIMOTHY NOYES, CHP, individual/official capacity, MICHAEL CRONSHEY, SHERLEE CRONSHEY, Mountain Auto Service and Towing Owners, individual, PRIVATE CITIZEN GARETH CHARLES NITCHMAN, individual and DOES
Case Number: 22-55785
Filed: August 23, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2022 Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Doris Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright. Date of service: 10/15/2022. [12564282] [22-55785]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached searchable PDF of the brief. 10/17/2022 by KWG] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 10/15/2022 02:49 PM]
October 11, 2022 Filing 10 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12559597] (CKP) [Entered: 10/11/2022 09:55 AM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright Correspondence: District Court documents. Date of service: 10/04/2022. [12555550] [22-55785]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 10/05/2022 by SLM] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 10/04/2022 11:34 AM]
September 25, 2022 Filing 8 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 6 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright. Date of service: 09/25/2022. [12548679] [22-55785] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 09/25/2022 08:58 AM]
September 25, 2022 Filing 7 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 6 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright. Date of service: 09/25/2022. [12548678] [22-55785] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 09/25/2022 08:50 AM]
September 23, 2022 Filing 6 Filed Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None [12547664]--[COURT UPDATE: attached exhibits. 09/26/2022 by SLM] (NAC) [Entered: 09/23/2022 10:29 AM]
September 21, 2022 Filing 5 COURT DELETED DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 4 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright. Date of service: 09/21/2022. [12545746] [22-55785] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 09/21/2022 01:22 PM]
September 21, 2022 Filing 4 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Mr. Ronald Frank Cutright and Doris Faye Cutright. Date of service: 09/21/2022. [12545706] [22-55785]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached PDF of the brief with exhibits filed in [5]. Removed PDF of the motion for appointment of counsel. 09/23/2022 by KWG] (Cutright, Ronald) [Entered: 09/21/2022 12:59 PM]
September 15, 2022 Filing 3 Filed order MEDIATION (RSK): The conference previously scheduled for September 27, 2022, is canceled. This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12541455] (ABT) [Entered: 09/15/2022 02:52 PM]
September 7, 2022 Filing 2 Filed order MEDIATION (VS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential. Participants with an email address on the attached list will receive an email with dial-in information. If an email address is not listed or if there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Participants may also leave a message at (415) 355-7900 to request dial-in information. Finally, please notify Circuit Mediator Robert Kaiser immediately by email (Robert_Kaiser@ca9.uscourts.gov) if a participant has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. Please copy all participants on any such communications. All emails should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All written or spoken communication with the mediator, including the discussions during the scheduled conference, are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. Additional information about confidentiality (including a copy of Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1), the assessment conference, and the Mediation Program are attached and can also be found at the Mediation Program website (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12534876] (RY) [Entered: 09/07/2022 11:29 AM]
August 23, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Doris Faye Cutright and Ronald Frank Cutright opening brief due 10/18/2022. Appellees Lance Bern, California Highway Patrol, Michael Cronshey, Sherlee Cronshey, Does, Gareth Charles Nitchman, Timothy Noyes and Telfinues Preszler answering brief due 11/17/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12523754] (JBS) [Entered: 08/23/2022 10:32 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ronald Cutright, et al v. CHP, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RONALD FRANK CUTRIGHT
Represented By: Ronald Frank Cutright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DORIS FAYE CUTRIGHT
Represented By: Doris Faye Cutright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DORIS CUTRIGHT
Represented By: Doris Cutright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TELFINUES PRESZLER, Retired CHP, individual/official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LANCE BERN, CHP, individual/official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TIMOTHY NOYES, CHP, individual/official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHAEL CRONSHEY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHERLEE CRONSHEY, Mountain Auto Service and Towing Owners, individual
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PRIVATE CITIZEN GARETH CHARLES NITCHMAN, individual
Represented By: John Gary Wurm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?