Lecia Shorter v. County of Los Angeles, et al
| LECIA L. SHORTER |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a California public entity, LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, a California public entity and DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive |
| 22-55803 |
| August 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (MDS, DAB and LVD) [12564344] (DJV) [Entered: 10/17/2022 07:08 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., DANIEL A. BRESS and LAWRENCE VANDYKE): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12547857] (AF) [Entered: 09/23/2022 12:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lecia L. Shorter opening brief due 10/27/2022. Appellees County of Los Angeles, Does and Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department answering brief due 11/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12526326] (RT) [Entered: 08/25/2022 12:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
