Luke Davis, et al v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
| LUKE DAVIS, JULIAN VARGAS and AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, DBA (doing business as) Labcorp |
| 22-55873 |
| September 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| LUKE DAVIS, ET AL V. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 12/20/2022, 09:00 a.m., Pacific Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings opening brief due 01/27/2023. Appellees American Council of the Blind, Luke Davis and Julian Vargas answering brief due 03/03/2023. Appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days afer service of the answering brief. See order for details. [12588799] (VS) [Entered: 11/16/2022 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 12 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 11/15/2022, 1:00 p.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12573192] (VS) [Entered: 10/26/2022 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 11 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 10/26/2022, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12566567] (BLS) [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 10 Streamlined request [9] by Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 day extensions. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings opening brief due 12/28/2022. Appellees American Council of the Blind, Luke Davis and Julian Vargas answering brief due 01/27/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12562845] (DLM) [Entered: 10/13/2022 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. New requested due date is 12/16/2022. [12562776] [22-55873] (Wahlquist, Becca) [Entered: 10/13/2022 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 8 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/06/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12558039]. [22-55873] (AD) [Entered: 10/07/2022 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellees American Council of the Blind, Luke Davis and Julian Vargas Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/06/2022. [12558018] [22-55873] (Bernal, Alison) [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:12 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Correspondence: Representation Statement. Date of service: 10/06/2022 [12557415] [22-55873] (Wahlquist, Becca) [Entered: 10/06/2022 12:41 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/30/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12553448]. [22-55873] (AD) [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/30/2022. [12553081] [22-55873] (Wahlquist, Becca) [Entered: 09/30/2022 08:24 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 09/27/2022. [12550292] (BY) [Entered: 09/27/2022 10:01 AM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/30/2022. Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings opening brief due 11/28/2022. Appellees American Council of the Blind, Luke Davis and Julian Vargas answering brief due 12/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12547953] (RT) [Entered: 09/23/2022 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 1 Filed order (DANIEL A. BRESS and LAWRENCE VANDYKE, Circuit Judges) in case no. 22-80053 on September 22, 2022: Petitioners motion for leave to file a reply in support of the petition for permission to appeal (Docket Entry No. 6) is granted. Petitioners reply has been filed. The court, in its discretion, grants the petition for permission to appeal the district courts order granting class action certification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2005). Within 14 days after the date of this order, petitioner shall perfect the appeal in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d). [12547947] (RT) [Entered: 09/23/2022 01:19 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Luke Davis, et al v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: LUKE DAVIS | |
| Represented By: | Alison Marie Bernal |
| Represented By: | Matthew Keith Handley |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Miller |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Sweet |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: JULIAN VARGAS | |
| Represented By: | Alison Marie Bernal |
| Represented By: | Matthew Keith Handley |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Miller |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Sweet |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated | |
| Represented By: | Alison Marie Bernal |
| Represented By: | Matthew Keith Handley |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Miller |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Sweet |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, DBA (doing business as) Labcorp | |
| Represented By: | Robert Steiner Esquire |
| Represented By: | Becca Wahlquist |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.