Luke Davis, et al v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Plaintiff / Appellee: LUKE DAVIS, JULIAN VARGAS and AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant: LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, DBA (doing business as) Labcorp
Case Number: 22-55873
Filed: September 23, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 8, 2024 LUKE DAVIS, ET AL V. LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2022 Filing 13 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 12/20/2022, 09:00 a.m., Pacific Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings opening brief due 01/27/2023. Appellees American Council of the Blind, Luke Davis and Julian Vargas answering brief due 03/03/2023. Appellants optional reply brief is due within 21 days afer service of the answering brief. See order for details. [12588799] (VS) [Entered: 11/16/2022 12:16 PM]
October 26, 2022 Filing 12 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 11/15/2022, 1:00 p.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12573192] (VS) [Entered: 10/26/2022 11:04 AM]
October 18, 2022 Filing 11 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 10/26/2022, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12566567] (BLS) [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:34 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 10 Streamlined request [9] by Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 day extensions. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings opening brief due 12/28/2022. Appellees American Council of the Blind, Luke Davis and Julian Vargas answering brief due 01/27/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12562845] (DLM) [Entered: 10/13/2022 03:19 PM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings. New requested due date is 12/16/2022. [12562776] [22-55873] (Wahlquist, Becca) [Entered: 10/13/2022 02:42 PM]
October 7, 2022 Filing 8 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/06/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12558039]. [22-55873] (AD) [Entered: 10/07/2022 06:44 AM]
October 6, 2022 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellees American Council of the Blind, Luke Davis and Julian Vargas Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/06/2022. [12558018] [22-55873] (Bernal, Alison) [Entered: 10/06/2022 11:12 PM]
October 6, 2022 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Correspondence: Representation Statement. Date of service: 10/06/2022 [12557415] [22-55873] (Wahlquist, Becca) [Entered: 10/06/2022 12:41 PM]
September 30, 2022 Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/30/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12553448]. [22-55873] (AD) [Entered: 09/30/2022 12:44 PM]
September 30, 2022 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/30/2022. [12553081] [22-55873] (Wahlquist, Becca) [Entered: 09/30/2022 08:24 AM]
September 27, 2022 Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 09/27/2022. [12550292] (BY) [Entered: 09/27/2022 10:01 AM]
September 23, 2022 Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/30/2022. Appellant Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings opening brief due 11/28/2022. Appellees American Council of the Blind, Luke Davis and Julian Vargas answering brief due 12/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12547953] (RT) [Entered: 09/23/2022 01:21 PM]
September 22, 2022 Filing 1 Filed order (DANIEL A. BRESS and LAWRENCE VANDYKE, Circuit Judges) in case no. 22-80053 on September 22, 2022: Petitioners motion for leave to file a reply in support of the petition for permission to appeal (Docket Entry No. 6) is granted. Petitioners reply has been filed. The court, in its discretion, grants the petition for permission to appeal the district courts order granting class action certification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2005). Within 14 days after the date of this order, petitioner shall perfect the appeal in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d). [12547947] (RT) [Entered: 09/23/2022 01:19 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Luke Davis, et al v. Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: LUKE DAVIS
Represented By: Alison Marie Bernal
Represented By: Matthew Keith Handley
Represented By: Jonathan Miller
Represented By: Benjamin Sweet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: JULIAN VARGAS
Represented By: Alison Marie Bernal
Represented By: Matthew Keith Handley
Represented By: Jonathan Miller
Represented By: Benjamin Sweet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: AMERICAN COUNCIL OF THE BLIND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Represented By: Alison Marie Bernal
Represented By: Matthew Keith Handley
Represented By: Jonathan Miller
Represented By: Benjamin Sweet
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: LABORATORY CORPORATION OF AMERICA HOLDINGS, DBA (doing business as) Labcorp
Represented By: Robert Steiner Esquire
Represented By: Becca Wahlquist
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?