Henry Foote v. The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Ben
| HENRY W. FOOTE |
| THE BEVERLY HILLS HOTEL AND BUNGALOWS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN |
| 22-55876 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Employee Retirement |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 11/29/2022, 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12588423] (CL) [Entered: 11/16/2022 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 11/15/2022. See order for details. [12568310] (CL) [Entered: 10/19/2022 05:47 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 10/19/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12553841] (CL) [Entered: 09/30/2022 04:04 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/29/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12553001]. [22-55876] (AD) [Entered: 09/29/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Employee Welfare Plan Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/29/2022. [12552505] [22-55876] (Maretz, Peter) [Entered: 09/29/2022 12:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Employee Welfare Plan Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/03/2022. Transcript ordered by 10/24/2022. Transcript due 11/23/2022. Appellant The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Benefit Employee Welfare Plan opening brief due 01/05/2023. Appellee Henry W. Foote answering brief due 02/06/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12548983] (RT) [Entered: 09/26/2022 09:49 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Henry Foote v. The Beverly Hills Hotel and Bungalows Employee Ben | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: HENRY W. FOOTE | |
| Represented By: | Russell George Petti |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: THE BEVERLY HILLS HOTEL AND BUNGALOWS EMPLOYEE BENEFIT EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN | |
| Represented By: | Jason Ehrenberg |
| Represented By: | Diana Lerma |
| Represented By: | Peter Maretz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
