Anthony Valdez v. Raymond Madden
ANTHONY VALDEZ |
RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden |
22-55905 |
October 3, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Brian Curtis McComas for Anthony Valdez) [12593803] (AEW) [Entered: 11/22/2022 10:35 AM] |
Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Motion [ # 6 ] (ECF Filing) filed by Appellant Anthony Valdez; Appellant Anthony Valdez opening brief due 02/27/2023. Appellee Raymond Madden, Warden answering brief due 03/29/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12593642] (GS) [Entered: 11/22/2022 09:25 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Anthony Valdez Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 02/27/2023. Date of service: 11/21/2022. [12592722] [22-55905] (McComas, Brian) [Entered: 11/21/2022 01:59 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner): Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) for appointment of counsel is granted. See 18 U.S.C. 3006A(a)(2)(B); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983). The court appoints Brian Curtis McComas, Esq., PMB 1605, 77 Van Ness Ave., Suite #101, San Francisco, CA 94102, 208-320-0383, mccomas.b.c@gmail.com, as appellants counsel of record. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. The Clerk will serve this order on appellant individually: #BE4795, Centinela State Prison P.O. Box 731, Imperial, CA 92251-0731. (Staff Attorney Office) [12592418] (OC) [Entered: 11/21/2022 11:32 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Anthony Valdez Motion for appointment of counsel. Date of service: 11/03/2022. [12579624] [22-55905] (McComas, Brian) [Entered: 11/03/2022 01:09 PM] |
Filing 3 Attorney Ana R. Duarte in 22-55905 substituted by Attorney Julie Ann Harris in 22-55905 [12576317] (DJV) [Entered: 10/31/2022 07:46 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Julie A. Harris (Department of Justice-Office of the Attorney General 300 S Spring Street, Suite 1702, Los Angeles, CA 90013) for Appellee Raymond Madden. Substitution for Attorney Ana R. Duarte for Appellee Raymond Madden. Date of service: 10/31/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12576299] [22-55905] (Harris, Julie) [Entered: 10/31/2022 07:36 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Anthony Valdez opening brief due 11/28/2022. Appellee Raymond Madden, Warden answering brief due 12/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12554433] (OC) [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Anthony Valdez v. Raymond Madden | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: ANTHONY VALDEZ | |
Represented By: | Brian Curtis McComas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden | |
Represented By: | Ana R. Duarte |
Represented By: | Julie Ann Harris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.