Kenneth Jones v. County of San Diego, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH JONES
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a Government Entity, SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, a Government Entity, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a Government Entity, ALPINE SHERRIF'S DEPARTMENT, a Government Entity and DOES, 1 through 50, Inclusive
Case Number: 22-55921
Filed: October 6, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 28, 2023 KENNETH JONES V. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 16, 2022 Filing 12 Terminated Appellees City of San Diego and San Diego Police Department in 22-55921 [12588582] (WL) [Entered: 11/16/2022 10:13 AM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 11 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): The motion to correct the caption (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is granted. The Clerk will amend the caption to reflect that the City of San Diego and the San Diego Police Department are not appellees in this appeal. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12588580] (WL) [Entered: 11/16/2022 10:11 AM]
November 1, 2022 Filing 10 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 11/15/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12578054] (VS) [Entered: 11/01/2022 02:09 PM]
November 1, 2022 Filing 9 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/01/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12577880]. [22-55921] (AD) [Entered: 11/01/2022 12:44 PM]
November 1, 2022 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kenneth Jones Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/01/2022. [12577439] [22-55921] (Salazar, Theida) [Entered: 11/01/2022 07:03 AM]
October 28, 2022 Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/28/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12575545]. [22-55921] (AD) [Entered: 10/28/2022 12:44 PM]
October 28, 2022 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kenneth Jones Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/28/2022. [12575161] [22-55921] (Salazar, Theida) [Entered: 10/28/2022 08:18 AM]
October 25, 2022 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees City of San Diego and San Diego Police Department Motion to dismiss party from case. Date of service: 10/25/2022. [12572535] [22-55921] (Krentz, Tyler) [Entered: 10/25/2022 01:28 PM]
October 25, 2022 Filing 4 Attorney Seetal Tejura substituted by Attorney Tyler Louis Krentz in 22-55921. [12572407] (HH) [Entered: 10/25/2022 11:36 AM]
October 25, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Tyler L. Krentz (Office of the City Attorney 1200 Third Avenue, Suite 1100, San Diego, CA 92101) for Appellee City of San Diego. Substitution for Attorney Seetal Tejura for Appellees City of San Diego and San Diego Police Department. Date of service: 10/25/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12572390] [22-55921] (Krentz, Tyler) [Entered: 10/25/2022 11:32 AM]
October 18, 2022 Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12566516] (BLS) [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:18 PM]
October 6, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kenneth Jones Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/13/2022. Transcript ordered by 11/04/2022. Transcript due 12/05/2022. Appellant Kenneth Jones opening brief due 01/13/2023. Appellees Alpine Sherrif's Department, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Does and San Diego Police Department answering brief due 02/13/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12557231] (JMR) [Entered: 10/06/2022 10:32 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kenneth Jones v. County of San Diego, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KENNETH JONES
Represented By: Jamon R. Hicks
Represented By: Theida Salazar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, a Government Entity
Represented By: Jennifer Marie Martin Esquire
Represented By: Jennifer Marie Martin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT, a Government Entity
Represented By: Seetal Tejura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a Government Entity
Represented By: Seetal Tejura
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ALPINE SHERRIF'S DEPARTMENT, a Government Entity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1 through 50, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?