Doyle Davis v. James Corcoran, et al
DOYLE WAYNE DAVIS |
JAMES CORCORAN, Correctional Officer, J. PULIDO, Correctional Officer, R. SKOG, Correctional Officer, SEARS, Correctional Officer, D. HAMPTON, Correctional Sergeant, COWART, Correctional Sergeant, S. HUSS, Correctional Sergeant, L. URENA, Correctional Sergeant, D. EUSTAQUIO, Correctional Sergeant, M. GONZALEZ, Correctional Officer, RUELAS, Correctional Officer, E. OMINIGBO, Correctional Officer, E. GONZALEZ, Correctional Officer, F. MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer, V. ACAYAN, Correctional Lieutenant, T. MARTINEZ, Correctional Lieutenant, J. MARTINEZ, Correctional Captain, SEAN DURMENT, Correctional Captain, S. STEADMAN, Associate Warden, SCOTT ANDERSON, Associate Warden, B. HENDRICK, Chief Deputy Warden, RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, SHAREE BROWN, Correctional Lieutenant, AIMS Unit, Y. SATO, Psychologist and KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, CDCR |
22-55959 |
October 17, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD R. CLIFTON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)); see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12610884] (OC) [Entered: 12/14/2022 03:52 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed Appellant Doyle Wayne Davis letter dated 11/29/2022 re: Follow-up filing to ensure timely court access. Paper filing deficiency: None. (Sent copy of docket sheet) [12603330] (RL) [Entered: 12/06/2022 11:31 AM] |
Filing 9 Filed Appellant Doyle Wayne Davis letter dated 11/08/2022 re:proof of delivery of materials . Paper filing deficiency: None. [12588166] (BJK) [Entered: 11/15/2022 04:34 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed Appellant Doyle Wayne Davis form 27 motion for temporary restraining order. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/08/2022. [12585392] (BJK) [Entered: 11/10/2022 04:51 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed original and 6 copies of Appellant Doyle Wayne Davis opening brief of 38 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 11/08/2022. (Motions to appoint counsel and proceed IFP pending, briefing remains stayed) [12585016] (LA) [Entered: 11/10/2022 02:08 PM] |
Filing 6 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request filed on 10/31/2022. [12577646] (JR) [Entered: 11/01/2022 10:29 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Doyle Wayne Davis Form 27 motion for correction of defendant/appellee's name. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/24/2022. [12577601] (BJK) [Entered: 11/01/2022 09:59 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Doyle Wayne Davis Form 29 letter dated 10/24/2022 requesting copy of FederalRules of Appellate Procedure and 9th Circuit Rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12577595] (BJK) [Entered: 11/01/2022 09:56 AM] |
Filing 3 ENTRY UPDATED. Filed Appellant Doyle Wayne Davis motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/24/2022. [12576604]--[Edited 11/10/2022 by BJK] (BJK) [Entered: 10/31/2022 11:21 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Doyle Wayne Davis motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/24/2022. [12576599] (BJK) [Entered: 10/31/2022 11:18 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCES FOR APPELLEES . SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Doyle Wayne Davis opening brief due 12/12/2022. [12565031] (WL) [Entered: 10/17/2022 01:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.