Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency v. Whittaker Corporation, et al
| DOES, 1-10, inclusive |
| SANTA CLARITA VALLEY WATER AGENCY |
| WHITTAKER CORPORATION |
| KEYSOR-CENTURY CORPORATION, a California corporation and SAUGUS INDUSTRIAL CENTER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company |
| 22-56043 |
| November 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Real Property Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 28 Received 6 paper copies of second brief on cross-appeal [ # 24 ] filed by Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency. [12719162] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (SD) [Entered: 05/19/2023 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 27 Received 3 paper copies of supplemental excerpts of record [ # 23 ] in 5 volume(s) and index volume filed by Appellee Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency. [12719158] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (SD) [Entered: 05/19/2023 11:12 AM] |
| Filing 26 Filed clerk order: The second brief on cross-appeal [ # 24 ] submitted by Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The supplemental excerpts of record [ # 23 ] submitted by Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12716033] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (KT) [Entered: 05/15/2023 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 25 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The parties joint motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 21 ]) to set word limits for the briefs is granted. Plaintiffs motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 22 ]) for leave to file an oversized brief is granted. The Clerk will file the second brief on cross-appeal submitted at Docket Entry No. 31. Defendants third brief on cross-appeal (combined reply brief in No. 22-55727 and answering brief in Nos. 22-55754 and 22-56043), limited to 26,000 words, is due June 7, 2023. Plaintiffs optional combined reply brief in Nos. 22-55754 and 22-56043, limited to 12,000 words, is due within 21 days after service of the third brief on cross-appeal. [12715411] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (WL) [Entered: 05/15/2023 07:43 AM] |
| Filing 24 Submitted (ECF) Second Brief on Cross-Appeal for review. Submitted by Appellee Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency in 22-55727, Appellant Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency in 22-55754, 22-56043. Date of service: 05/08/2023. [12711551] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Meeker, Jennifer) [Entered: 05/08/2023 09:27 PM] |
| Filing 23 Submitted (ECF) supplemental excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellee Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency in 22-55727, Appellant Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency in 22-55754, 22-56043. Date of service: 05/08/2023. [12711211] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Meeker, Jennifer) [Entered: 05/08/2023 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 22 Filed (ECF) Appellee Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency in 22-55727, Appellant Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency in 22-55754, 22-56043 Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion for leave to file a combined brief with no more than 32,000 words]. Date of service: 05/08/2023. [12710847] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Meeker, Jennifer) [Entered: 05/08/2023 12:21 PM] |
| Filing 21 Filed (ECF) Appellee Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency in 22-55727, Appellant Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency in 22-55754, 22-56043 Joint Motion for miscellaneous relief [Motion to set page limits for combined briefing]. Date of service: 04/21/2023. [12700451] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Meeker, Jennifer) [Entered: 04/21/2023 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 20 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SSR): Plaintiff Santa Clarita Valley Water Agencys motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 13 ]) to set a briefing schedule in case No. 22-56043 is denied as unnecessary. Case Nos. 22-55754 and 22-56043 are consolidated and will be briefed together on a cross-appeal schedule with case No. 22-55727. Plaintiffs streamlined request (Docket Entry No. 24) for an extension of time to file the second brief on cross-appeal is approved. Plaintiffs second brief on cross-appeal (combined answering brief in No. 22-55727 and opening brief in Nos. 22-55754 and 22-56043) is due May 8, 2023. Defendants third brief on cross-appeal (combined reply brief in No. 22-55727 and answering brief in Nos. 22-55754 and 22-56043) is due June 7, 2023. Plaintiffs optional combined reply brief in Nos. 22-55754 and 22-56043 is due within 21 days after service of the third brief on cross-appeal. [12678639] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (WL) [Entered: 03/21/2023 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 19 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 15 ] in 9 volume(s) and index volume filed by Appellant Whittaker Corporation. [12676334] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (SD) [Entered: 03/17/2023 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 18 Received 6 paper copies of First Brief on Cross-Appeal [ # 14 ] filed by Whittaker Corporation. [12675724] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (SD) [Entered: 03/16/2023 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellee Whittaker Corporation in 22-55754, 22-56043 response to motion ([ # 13 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 13 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 03/10/2023. [12672094] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Elliott, Mark) [Entered: 03/10/2023 08:52 PM] |
| Filing 16 Filed clerk order: The first brief on cross-appeal [ # 14 ] submitted by Whittaker Corporation is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 15 ] submitted by Whittaker Corporation are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12670329] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (KT) [Entered: 03/09/2023 09:08 AM] |
| Filing 15 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Whittaker Corporation in 22-55727. Date of service: 03/08/2023. [12670215] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Elliott, Mark) [Entered: 03/08/2023 06:53 PM] |
| Filing 14 Submitted (ECF) First Brief on Cross-Appeal for review. Submitted by Appellant Whittaker Corporation in 22-55727. Date of service: 03/08/2023. [12670204] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043]--[COURT UPDATE: updated docket text to correct brief type. 03/09/2023 by KT] (Elliott, Mark) [Entered: 03/08/2023 06:31 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellee Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency in 22-55727 Urgent Motion for miscellaneous relief [MOTION OF SANTA CLARITA VALLEY WATER AGENCY TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN CASE NO 22-56043]. Date of service: 03/08/2023. [12669869] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Meeker, Jennifer) [Entered: 03/08/2023 02:22 PM] |
| Filing 12 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SSR): Defendants motion (included in Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ]) to reset the briefing schedule in these consolidated cross-appeals is granted in part. The first brief on cross-appeal is now due March 8, 2023. The second brief on cross-appeal is due April 7, 2023. The third brief on cross-appeal is due May 8, 2023. The optional cross-appeal reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the third brief on cross-appeal. Defendants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ]) to consolidate is denied as unnecessary. The January 18, 2023, notice of appeal was filed as an amended notice of appeal in No. 22-55727 at Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]. [12640288] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (WL) [Entered: 01/27/2023 08:53 AM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Whittaker Corporation in 22-55727, Appellee Whittaker Corporation in 22-55754, 22-56043 Correspondence: Correspondence waiving Reply to Partial Objection, but Seeking Expedited Decision. Date of service: 01/26/2023 [12640208] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Elliott, Mark) [Entered: 01/26/2023 05:28 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency in 22-56043 response to motion ([ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 9 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 01/25/2023. [12638915] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Gee, Byron) [Entered: 01/25/2023 05:17 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Whittaker Corporation in 22-55727, Appellee Whittaker Corporation in 22-55754, 22-56043 Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 04/07/2023. Date of service: 01/20/2023. [12634639] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Elliott, Mark) [Entered: 01/20/2023 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 8 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court, filed 1/18/2023. [12632910] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (HH) [Entered: 01/18/2023 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 7 Terminated attorney Daniel Howard Bromberg for appellant Whittaker Corporation in 22-55727. [12631433] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (HH) [Entered: 01/17/2023 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Mr. Daniel Howard Bromberg, Esquire for Appellant Whittaker Corporation in 22-55727. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Date of service: 01/17/2023. [12631300] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (Bromberg, Daniel) [Entered: 01/17/2023 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed order MEDIATION (SML): These cases are RELEASED from the Mediation Program. The briefing schedule is reset as follows: the first cross-appeal brief for Whittaker Corporation is due February 06, 2023; the second cross-appeal brief for Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency is due March 08, 2023; the third cross-appeal brief for Whittaker Corporation is due April 07, 2023; the optional cross-appeal reply brief is due within 21 days from the service date of the third cross-appeal brief. [12601718] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (WL) [Entered: 12/05/2022 08:08 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (SL): These appeals are consolidated. The briefing schedules previously set by the court are vacated. On or before December 05, 2022, counsel shall provide a status report by email to the Circuit Mediator (Stephen_Liacouras@ca9.uscourts.gov). Counsel are requested to include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. The status report should not be filed with the court. [12596915] [22-55727, 22-55754, 22-56043] (WL) [Entered: 11/28/2022 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/17/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12590748]. [22-56043] (AD) [Entered: 11/17/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/17/2022. [12590161] [22-56043] (Gee, Byron) [Entered: 11/17/2022 01:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/17/2022. Transcript ordered by 12/09/2022. Transcript due 01/09/2023. Appellant Santa Clarita Valley Water Agency opening brief due 02/17/2023. Appellee Whittaker Corporation answering brief due 03/20/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12584646] (RT) [Entered: 11/10/2022 10:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
