Darryl Cotton v. Gina Austin, et al
| LARRY GERACI, an individual, REBECCA BERRY, an individual, AUSTIN LEGAL GROUP, a professional corporation, MICHAEL WEINSTEIN, an individual, SCOTT H. TOOTHACRE, an individual, FERRIS & BRITTON, a professional corporation, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a public entity, CYNTHIA A. BASHANT, an individual, DOES, 1-50, inclusive and JOEL R. WOHLFEIL, an individual |
| DARRYL COTTON, an individual |
| GINA M. AUSTIN, an individual, JESSICA CLAIRE MCELFRESH, an individual and DAVID S. DEMIAN, an individual |
| 22-56077 |
| November 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellee Jessica Claire McElfresh reply to response (motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction). Date of service: 01/10/2023. [12627771] [22-56077] (Stewart, Laura) [Entered: 01/10/2023 05:52 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellee Gina M. Austin reply to response (). Date of service: 01/09/2023. [12626455] [22-56077] (Fraser, Annie) [Entered: 01/09/2023 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Darryl Cotton response to motion (motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction). Date of service: 01/03/2023. [12622189] [22-56077]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 01/04/2023 by SLM] (Cotton, Darryl) [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:51 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellee David S. Demian reply to response (). Date of service: 12/27/2022. [12617973] [22-56077] (Bertsche, Corinne) [Entered: 12/27/2022 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Jessica Claire McElfresh Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 12/23/2022. [12617317] [22-56077] (Stewart, Laura) [Entered: 12/23/2022 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Darryl Cotton Motion to take judicial notice. Date of service: 12/21/2022. [12616206] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [ # 6 ] .] (TYL) [Entered: 12/22/2022 08:34 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Darryl Cotton response to motion (motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction). Date of service: 12/21/2022. [12616141] [22-56077] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type and removed motion (refiled in entry [ # 7 ]). 12/22/2022 by TYL] (Cotton, Darryl) [Entered: 12/21/2022 10:19 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee Gina M. Austin Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 12/12/2022. [12608120] [22-56077] (Fraser, Annie) [Entered: 12/12/2022 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Annie Featherman Fraser for party(s) Appellee Gina M. Austin, in case 22-56077. [12608070] (QDL) [Entered: 12/12/2022 12:53 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Annie F. Fraser, Esq. (Pettit Kohn Ingrassia Lutz & Dolin PC; 11622 El Camino Real, Suite 300, San Diego, CA 92130.) for Appellee Gina M. Austin. Date of service: 12/12/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12608045] [22-56077] (Fraser, Annie) [Entered: 12/12/2022 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee David S. Demian Motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Date of service: 12/06/2022. [12603840] [22-56077] (Bertsche, Corinne) [Entered: 12/06/2022 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Darryl Cotton opening brief due 01/17/2023. Appellees Gina M. Austin, David S. Demian and Jessica Claire McElfresh answering brief due 02/16/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12592518] (JBS) [Entered: 11/21/2022 12:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
