Melike Dewey v. Los Angeles City College Financial Aid Office, et al
| MELIKE DEWEY |
| LOS ANGELES CITY COLLEGE FINANCIAL AID OFFICE, in its official capacity, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ROB BONTA, Attorney General, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, DIRECT LOANS, COAST PROFESSIONAL, INC., UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL and DOES, 1-10 |
| 22-56105 |
| November 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Truth in Lending |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD R. CLIFTON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12610536] (WL) [Entered: 12/14/2022 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Melike Dewey opening brief due 01/26/2023. Appellees Rob Bonta, Coast Professional, Inc., Direct Loans, Does, Los Angeles City College Financial Aid Office, Regents of the University of California Davis, State of California, U.S. Department of Education, United States Attorney General and United States Department of Justice answering brief due 02/27/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12595759] (RT) [Entered: 11/25/2022 11:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
