G. G., et al v. Conejo Valley Unified School District
Plaintiff / Appellant: G. G., a minor, by and through his Parents, Rachel Good and Darren Good, and on their own behalves, RACHEL GOOD and DARREN GOOD, Guardian Ad Litem G. G.
Defendant / Appellee: CONEJO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Case Number: 22-56137
Filed: December 2, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights - Education
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 17, 2023 Filing 10 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: KS) The dial-in telephone assessment conference previously scheduled for January 31, 2023, is cancelled. Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ]), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12631664] (WL) [Entered: 01/17/2023 01:27 PM]
January 6, 2023 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants G. G., Darren Good and Rachel Good Stipulated Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 01/06/2023. [12624798] [22-56137] (DuBovy, N.) [Entered: 01/06/2023 01:23 PM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 01/31/2023, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12622269] (CL) [Entered: 01/04/2023 08:23 AM]
December 28, 2022 Filing 7 Added Attorney Tamra Kaufman for Appellee Conejo Valley Unified School District, in case 22-56137. [12619193] (HH) [Entered: 12/28/2022 12:27 PM]
December 28, 2022 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Tamra, J., Kaufman (Adams Silva & McNally LLP, 898 N. Pacific Coast Hwy, Suite 825, El Segundo, California 90245) for Appellee Conejo Valley Unified School District. Date of service: 12/28/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12619186] [22-56137] (Kaufman, Tamra) [Entered: 12/28/2022 12:23 PM]
December 21, 2022 Filing 5 Added Attorney Ricardo R. Silva for Appellee Conejo Valley Unified School District, in case 22-56137. [12615697] (HH) [Entered: 12/21/2022 12:17 PM]
December 21, 2022 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Ricardo, R., Silva (Adams Silva & McNally LLP, 2888 Loker Ave. E, Suite 303, Carlsbad, California 92010) for Appellee Conejo Valley Unified School District. Date of service: 12/21/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12615624] [22-56137] (Silva, Ricardo) [Entered: 12/21/2022 11:16 AM]
December 9, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/09/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12607476]. [22-56137] (AD) [Entered: 12/09/2022 06:44 PM]
December 9, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants G. G., Darren Good and Rachel Good Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/09/2022. [12607071] [22-56137] (DuBovy, N.) [Entered: 12/09/2022 02:06 PM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants G. G., Darren Good and Rachel Good Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/09/2022. Transcript ordered by 01/03/2023. Transcript due 01/30/2023. Appellants G. G., Darren Good and Rachel Good opening brief due 03/13/2023. Appellee Conejo Valley Unified School District answering brief due 04/10/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12601045] (JMR) [Entered: 12/02/2022 01:19 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: G. G., et al v. Conejo Valley Unified School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: G. G., a minor, by and through his Parents, Rachel Good and Darren Good, and on their own behalves
Represented By: N. Jane DuBovy Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: RACHEL GOOD
Represented By: N. Jane DuBovy Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DARREN GOOD, Guardian Ad Litem G. G.
Represented By: N. Jane DuBovy Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CONEJO VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Represented By: Stephanie S. Baril
Represented By: Tamra Kaufman
Represented By: Ricardo R. Silva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?