Mauricio Godoy v. County of Los Angeles, et al
| MAURICIO JOSE GODOY, AKA Maurice Godoy, Maurice Videsstrazz Godoy |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT and DETECTIVE STANLEY LEMELLE |
| 22-56140 |
| December 5, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): Appellant's motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) for voluntary dismissal is denied because the motion requests dismissal without prejudice. If appellant seeks voluntary dismissal of this appeal, the motion must request dismissal with prejudice. Within 21 days of this order, appellant may file a renewed motion for voluntary dismissal requesting dismissal with prejudice. If appellant does not file a motion for voluntary dismissal with prejudice, appellants response to the courts January 12, 2023 order is due within 21 days of the date of this order. The Clerk will send appellant a copy of the January 12, 2023 order and a form motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal. Briefing remains suspended pending resolution of the January 12, 2023 order. [12643398] (WL) [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:57 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Mauricio Jose Godoy motion to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Deficiencies: None. Served on. [12638056] (JFF) [Entered: 01/25/2023 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Mauricio Jose Godoy motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief. Deficiencies: None. [12632609] (JFF) [Entered: 01/18/2023 10:45 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward.[12629828] (WL) [Entered: 01/12/2023 05:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received notice of change of address dated from Mauricio Jose Godoy. New address: CHCF-EI-103 P.O Box 213040 Stockton, CA 95213. [12628131]--[Edited: address updated. 01/11/2023 by SLM] (JFF) [Entered: 01/11/2023 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Mauricio Jose Godoy motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12627511] (JFF) [Entered: 01/10/2023 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12607524] (CKP) [Entered: 12/11/2022 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Mauricio Jose Godoy opening brief due 01/30/2023. [12602048] (JMR) [Entered: 12/05/2022 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
