Dean Steeves v. IRS
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEAN ALLEN STEEVES
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Case Number: 22-56170
Filed: December 13, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instruments

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 29, 2024 DEAN STEEVES V. IRS

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 1, 2023 Filing 8 Attorney Pooja Boisture in 22-56170 substituted by Attorney Curtis Clarence Pett in 22-56170 [12643667] (QDL) [Entered: 02/01/2023 08:54 AM]
February 1, 2023 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Curtis C. Pett (U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Appellate Section, Post Office Box 502, Washington, D.C. 20044) for Appellee IRS. Substitution for Attorney Pooja Boisture for Appellee IRS. Date of service: 02/01/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12643642] [22-56170] (Pett, Curtis) [Entered: 02/01/2023 08:28 AM]
January 11, 2023 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 13, 2023. The answering brief is due May 15, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12628086] (AF) [Entered: 01/11/2023 11:11 AM]
December 23, 2022 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dean Allen Steeves Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 04/13/2023. Date of service: 12/23/2022. [12617418] [22-56170] (Steeves, Dean) [Entered: 12/23/2022 02:50 PM]
December 20, 2022 Filing 4 Terminated Unregistered Attorney Cassondra L. Koven for IRS in 22-56170. Party has alternate counsel. [12614619] (SVG) [Entered: 12/20/2022 09:36 AM]
December 15, 2022 Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Pooja Boisture for party(s) Appellee IRS. [12611405] (RL) [Entered: 12/15/2022 11:06 AM]
December 15, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Pooja A. Boisture (U.S. Department of Justice, Tax Division, Appellate Section, Post Office Box 502, Washington, D.C. 20044) for Appellee IRS. Date of service: 12/15/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12611247] [22-56170] (Boisture, Pooja) [Entered: 12/15/2022 09:42 AM]
December 13, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Dean Allen Steeves opening brief due 02/13/2023. Appellee United States Internal Revenue Service answering brief due 03/13/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12609241] (RT) [Entered: 12/13/2022 11:50 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dean Steeves v. IRS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DEAN ALLEN STEEVES
Represented By: Dean Allen Steeves
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
Represented By: Cassondra L. Koven
Represented By: Curtis Clarence Pett Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?