DraftExpress, Inc. v. Whistle Sports, Inc.
| DRAFTEXPRESS, INC. |
| WHISTLE SPORTS, INC. |
| 22-56188 |
| December 20, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Copyright |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: LKK) : Appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ] ) for voluntary dismissal is granted. This appeal is dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court acts as the mandate of this court. [12655310] (RT) [Entered: 02/16/2023 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Whistle Sports, Inc. Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 01/27/2023. [12640469] [22-56188] (Bandlow, Lincoln) [Entered: 01/27/2023 10:32 AM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12639659] (VS) [Entered: 01/26/2023 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 01/18/2023, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12623220] (VS) [Entered: 01/04/2023 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/27/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12618751]. [22-56188] (AD) [Entered: 12/27/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Whistle Sports, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/27/2022. [12618534] [22-56188] (Bandlow, Lincoln) [Entered: 12/27/2022 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Whistle Sports, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/27/2022. Appellant Whistle Sports, Inc. opening brief due 02/21/2023. Appellee DraftExpress, Inc. answering brief due 03/23/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12614722] (JBS) [Entered: 12/20/2022 10:36 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: DraftExpress, Inc. v. Whistle Sports, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: DRAFTEXPRESS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Craig B. Sanders |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: WHISTLE SPORTS, INC. | |
| Represented By: | Lincoln Dee Bandlow Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
