John Miller v. Daniel Sanchez, et al
| JOHN L. MILLER |
| DANIEL SANCHEZ, Litigation Coordinator, individual, A. PFEIL, Correctional Lieutenant, individual, M. WARMSLEY, Library Technical Assistant, individual, SOHAIL AFRA, Dr., M.D., Staff Physician, individual, M. MIJANGOS, Health Care Grievance Office Representative, individual, G. STRATMAN, Office Technician, individual, S. LANE, Correctional Officer, individual, C. CURRY, Correctional Officer, individual and P. M. CARRANZA, Correctional Sergeant, individual |
| 22-56202 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| JOHN MILLER V. DANIEL SANCHEZ, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request received on 01-06-2023. [12625514] (JR) [Entered: 01/09/2023 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received Appellant John L. Miller request for copy of FRAP Rules. [12625349] (NAC) [Entered: 01/09/2023 07:53 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12624192] (CKP) [Entered: 01/05/2023 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant John L. Miller opening brief due 02/21/2023. [12616891] (RT) [Entered: 12/22/2022 04:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
