Portillo Acuna v. Garland
Petitioner: WALTER IRVING PORTILLO ACUNA, N. I. P. S. and C. I. S. P.
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-612
Filed: March 31, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 11, 2023 Filing 25 MANDATE ISSUED Michael Daly HAWKINS, Sidney R. THOMAS, M. Margaret McKEOWN [Entered: 09/11/2023 10:22 AM]
July 19, 2023 Filing 24 MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Michael Daly HAWKINS, Sidney R. THOMAS, M. Margaret McKEOWN) PETITION DENIED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 07/19/2023 01:30 PM]
September 7, 2022 Filing 23 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/07/2022 03:42:00 PM]
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 08/31/2022 03:56:00 PM]
August 31, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER FILED. The governments motion (Docket Entry No. 19) for leave to file a corrected certified administrative record (CAR) is granted. The Clerk will strike the CAR filed at Docket Entry No. 11. The corrected CAR has been filed at Docket Entry No. 18. The answering brief remains due September 2, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/31/2022 11:03:00 AM]
August 31, 2022 Filing 20 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/31/2022 08:10:00 AM]
August 26, 2022 Filing 19 MOTION to supplement or correct the record filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/26/2022 10:53:00 AM]
August 26, 2022 Filing 18 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 08/26/2022 06:29:00 AM]
July 5, 2022 Filing 17 CLERK ACTION: Supplemental Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Petitioners is filed. Original and 1 copy. [Entered: 07/05/2022 02:17:00 PM]
July 5, 2022 Filing 16 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioners. [Entered: 07/05/2022 02:15:00 PM]
May 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/05/2022 02:48:00 PM]
May 5, 2022 Filing 14 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 13 by Petitioner is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 05/05/2022 01:56:00 PM]
May 5, 2022 Filing 13 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Walter Irving Portillo Acuna. [Entered: 05/05/2022 01:55:00 PM]
May 4, 2022 Filing 12 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/04/2022 10:59:00 AM]
May 2, 2022 Filing 11 STRICKEN PER ORDER AT DE 21 --- CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 05/02/2022 07:19:00 AM] [Edited: 08/31/2022 11:14:00 AM]
April 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record remains due May 5, 2022. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due May 26, 2022. The opening brief is due July 5, 2022. The answering brief is due September 2, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/05/2022 04:03:00 PM]
April 4, 2022 Filing 9 ADDED Petitioner N. I. P. S.. [Entered: 04/04/2022 12:11:00 PM]
April 4, 2022 Filing 8 ADDED Petitioner C. I. S. P.. [Entered: 04/04/2022 12:10:00 PM]
April 1, 2022 Filing 7 ADDED Tatiana G. Pino for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/01/2022 08:42:00 AM]
April 1, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Tatiana G. Pino for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 04/01/2022 06:12:00 AM]
March 31, 2022 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 5/5/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 5/26/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 7/5/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 9/2/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/31/2022 02:30:00 PM]
March 31, 2022 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 3/31/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-612 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/31/2022 02:28:00 PM]
March 31, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/31/2022 01:50:00 PM]
March 31, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 03/31/2022 01:50:00 PM]
March 31, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 03/31/2022 01:49:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Portillo Acuna v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: WALTER IRVING PORTILLO ACUNA
Represented By: Walter Irving Portillo Acuna
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: N. I. P. S.
Represented By: N. I. P. S
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: C. I. S. P.
Represented By: C. I. S. P
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Tatiana G. Pino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?